Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Mar;34(3):1070-1076.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06854-3. Epub 2019 May 30.

Surgical outcomes according to the type of monopolar electrocautery device used in laparoscopic surgery for right colon cancer: a comparison of endo-hook versus endo-shears

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Surgical outcomes according to the type of monopolar electrocautery device used in laparoscopic surgery for right colon cancer: a comparison of endo-hook versus endo-shears

Jeehye Lee et al. Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Although monopolar electrocautery is preferred by many laparoscopic surgeons and is more cost-effective than bipolar or ultrasonic scissors, few studies have compared these outcomes between different monopolar electrocautery devices used in laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, this study compared the surgical outcomes between monopolar endo-hook versus endo-shears during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer.

Methods: Using a prospective database of patients treated at our institute, we analyzed the surgical outcomes of 358 consecutive patients with right colon cancer who underwent curative laparoscopic surgery with a monopolar endo-hook (n = 164) or endo-shears (n = 194) between March 2009 and March 2017.

Results: There were no differences in age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists' grade, previous operative history, or clinical stage between the endo-hook and endo-shears groups. The estimated blood loss was similar between the endo-hook and endo-shears groups (90.9 ± 60.3 vs. 92.0 ± 89.3 mL; P = 0.893). The number of harvested lymph nodes was greater in the endo-hook group (53.5 ± 20.3 vs. 48.1 ± 18.5; P = 0.008). Hospital stay was shorter in the endo-hook group (6.8 ± 2.2 vs. 7.8 ± 4.8 days; P = 0.013). Although chylous ascites was more frequent in the endo-hook group (21.3% vs. 7.7%, P < 0.001), the postoperative morbidity rate was lower in this group (9.8% vs. 18.0%; P = 0.025). All instances of chylous ascites healed spontaneously without intervention.

Conclusions: This study showed that the use of a monopolar endo-hook during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy might permit more meticulous lymph-node dissection and reduce morbidity compared with the use of monopolar endo-shears. Therefore, we suggest that the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery might be associated with the type of electrocautery device used.

Keywords: Colon cancer; Endo-hook; Endo-shears; Monopolar electrocautery; Surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Dec;32(12):1703-1710 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 2013 Oct;206(4):555-9 - PubMed
    1. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Nov;13(11):808-10 - PubMed
    1. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Feb;25(1):e37-41 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Aug 1;21(15):2912-9 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources