Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar;22(3):238-245.
doi: 10.22038/ijbms.2018.30067.7245.

Clonal dissemination of Staphylococcus aureus isolates causing nosocomial infections, Tehran, Iran

Affiliations

Clonal dissemination of Staphylococcus aureus isolates causing nosocomial infections, Tehran, Iran

Mehdi Goudarzi et al. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2019 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: In the current research, the prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus clones and genes encoding antimicrobial resistance and toxins were examined among 120 S. aureus strains from nosocomial infections in tehran, Iran.

Materials and methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility was examined, based on disk diffusion and PCR method to identify resistance and toxin-encoding genes. Based on the polymorphisms in SCCmec, agr, spa, and MLST, the isolates were typed.

Results: Among 120 S. aureus isolates, 85 (70.8%) were methicilin resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and 35 (29.2%) were methicilin sensetive S. aureus (MSSA). The tested isolates contained resistance genes, including ant(4΄)-Ia (90%), aac(6΄)-Ie/aph(2˝) (80%), aph(3΄)-IIIa (30%), erm(A) (26.7%), erm(B) (10.8%), erm(C) (11.7%), msr(A) (40.8%), msr(B) (14.2%), tet(M) (45.8%), and mupA (8.3%). The MRSA strains were clustered into six different clones. The most common genotypes included ST239-SCCmec III/t037 (23.3%), ST239-SCCmec III/t388 (22.5%), ST22-SCCmec IV/t790 (8.3%), ST15-SCCmec IV/t084 (7.5%), ST585-SCCmec III/t713 (5%), and ST239-SCCmec III/t924 (4.2%), respectively. ST182/t196 (8.3%) and ST123/t171 (5%) belonged exclusively to MSSA strains. Overall, 10 (66.7%) and 5 (33.3%) out of 15 isolates with pvl genes were attributed to clones ST22-SCCmec IV/t790 and ST15-SCCmec IV/t084, respectively. ST22-SCCmec IV/t790, ST239-SCCmec III/t037, and ST15-SCCmec IV/t084, were related to high-level mupirocin-resistant phenotypes.

Conclusion: The genetic diversity of S. aureus was confirmed in our hospitals, and ST239-SCCmec III/t037 showed a relatively high prevalence in our study. It seems that assessment of resistance and virulence genes in different S. aureus molecular types is necessary for proper antibiotic consumption.

Keywords: Agr; MLST; MRSA; SCCmec; Spa; Staphylococcus aureus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the content of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Resistance pattern of Staphylococcus aureus obtained from clinical samples
Figure 2
Figure 2
A) Lane M, 100-bp DNA Ladder (Fermentas, UK); Lane 1 PCR product of aac(6΄)-Ie/aph(2˝) encoding gene, Lane 2 PCR product of PCR product of aph(3΄)-IIIa encoding gene, Lane 3 PCR product of erm(A) encoding gene, Lane 4 PCR product of erm(B) encoding gene, Lane 5 PCR product of erm(C) encoding gene, Lane 6 PCR product of msr(A) encoding gene, Lane 7 PCR product of msr(B) encoding gene, Lane 8 PCR product of mupA encoding gene, and Lane 9 PCR product of tet(M) encoding gene. B) Lane M, DNA Ladder; lane 1 negative control, Lane 2 the 323 bp PCR product of agr type III, lane 3 the 575 bp PCR product of agr type II, lane 4 the 441 bp PCR product of agr type I, lane 5 the 518 bp PCR product of SCCmec Type III, lane 6 the 937 and 415 bp PCR products of SCCmec Type IV. C) Lane M, DNA ladder; lane 1-5, variable PCR product of spa. D) Lane M, DNA Ladder; Lane 1the 270 bp PCR product of nucA gene, Lane 2the 93 bp PCR product of eta gene, Lane 3the 226 bp PCR product of etb gene, Lane 4the 398 bp PCR product oftst-1 gene, Lane 5the 180 bp PCR product of luk-PV gene, Lane 6the 583 bp PCR product of mecA gene
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of spa types in methicilin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicilin sensetive S. aureus (MSSA) strains isolated from nosocomial infections
Figure 4
Figure 4
Distribution of molecular types in 85 methicilin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains isolated from nosocomial infections

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tong SY, Davis JS, Eichenberger E, Holland TL, Fowler VG. Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28:603–661. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dulon M, Haamann F, Peters C, Schablon A, Nienhaus A. MRSA prevalence in European healthcare settings: a review. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11:138–151. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chambers HF. The changing epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus? Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7:178–182. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boye K, Bartels MD, Andersen IS, Moeller JA, Westh H. A new multiplex PCR for easy screening of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus SCCmec types I–V. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13:725–727. - PubMed
    1. Stefani S, Chung DR, Lindsay JA, Friedrich AW, Kearns AM, Westh H, et al. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): global epidemiology and harmonisation of typing methods. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012;39:273–282. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources