Use of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Patients With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study
- PMID: 31158846
- DOI: 10.7326/M18-2937
Use of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Patients With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study
Abstract
Background: Existing guidelines, including Choosing Wisely recommendations, endorse avoiding placement of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
Objective: To describe the frequency of and characteristics associated with PICC use in hospitalized patients with stage 3b or greater CKD (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] <45 mL/min/1.73 m2).
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: 52 hospitals participating in the Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium.
Participants: Hospitalized medical patients who received a PICC between November 2013 and September 2016.
Measurements: Percentage of patients receiving PICCs who had CKD, frequency of PICC-related complications, and variation in the proportion of PICCs placed in patients with CKD.
Results: Of 20 545 patients who had PICCs placed, 4743 (23.1% [95% CI, 20.9% to 25.3%]) had an estimated GFR (eGFR) less than 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 699 (3.4%) were receiving hemodialysis. In the intensive care unit (ICU), 30.9% (CI, 29.7% to 32.2%) of patients receiving PICCs had an eGFR less than 45 mL/min/1.73 m2; the corresponding percentage in wards was 19.3% (CI, 18.8% to 19.9%). Among patients with an eGFR less than 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, multilumen PICCs were placed more frequently than single-lumen PICCs. In wards, PICC-related complications occurred in 15.3% of patients with an eGFR less than 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 and in 15.2% of those with an eGFR of 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 or higher. The corresponding percentages in ICU settings were 22.4% and 23.9%. In patients with an eGFR less than 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, PICC placement varied widely across hospitals (interquartile range, 23.7% to 37.8% in ICUs and 12.8% to 23.7% in wards).
Limitation: Nephrologist approval for placement could not be determined, and 2.7% of eGFR values were unknown and excluded.
Conclusion: In this sample of hospitalized patients who received PICCs, placement in those with CKD was common and not concordant with clinical guidelines.
Primary funding source: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and Blue Care Network.
Comment in
-
Saving Veins, Saving Lives, for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jul 2;171(1):60-61. doi: 10.7326/M19-1086. Epub 2019 Jun 4. Ann Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 31158848 No abstract available.
-
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Patients With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.Ann Intern Med. 2019 Nov 5;171(9):683. doi: 10.7326/L19-0536. Ann Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 31683283 No abstract available.
-
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Patients With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.Ann Intern Med. 2019 Nov 5;171(9):683-684. doi: 10.7326/L19-0537. Ann Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 31683284 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Association of Infectious Disease Physician Approval of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter With Appropriateness and Complications.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2017659. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17659. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 33084898 Free PMC article.
-
Patterns of use and outcomes of peripherally inserted central catheters in hospitalized patients with solid tumors: A multicenter study.Cancer. 2022 Oct;128(20):3681-3690. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34410. Epub 2022 Aug 9. Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35943390
-
Risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with peripherally inserted central venous catheters used in hospitalized patients.Chest. 2005 Aug;128(2):489-95. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.2.489. Chest. 2005. PMID: 16100130 Review.
-
Association between delivery methods for red blood cell transfusion and the risk of venous thromboembolism: a longitudinal study.Lancet Haematol. 2016 Dec;3(12):e563-e571. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(16)30132-6. Epub 2016 Nov 3. Lancet Haematol. 2016. PMID: 27818170 Clinical Trial.
-
The Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC) initiative: A summary and review of peripherally inserted central catheter and venous catheter appropriate use.J Hosp Med. 2016 Apr;11(4):306-10. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2525. Epub 2015 Dec 14. J Hosp Med. 2016. PMID: 26662622 Review.
Cited by
-
Midline vs Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter for Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy.JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Nov 11:e245984. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.5984. Online ahead of print. JAMA Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 39527077 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and facilitators for implementing peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) appropriateness guidelines: A longitudinal survey study from 34 Michigan hospitals.PLoS One. 2022 Nov 4;17(11):e0277302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277302. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 36331967 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing peripherally inserted central catheter-related practices across hospitals with different insertion models: a multisite qualitative study.BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Aug;30(8):628-638. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011987. Epub 2020 Dec 24. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021. PMID: 33361343 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Infectious Disease Physician Approval of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter With Appropriateness and Complications.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2017659. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17659. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 33084898 Free PMC article.
-
Reducing Phlebotomy in Hemodialysis Patients: A Quality Improvement Study.Kidney Med. 2020 Jun 15;2(4):432-436. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2020.05.006. eCollection 2020 Jul-Aug. Kidney Med. 2020. PMID: 32775983 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous