Use of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Patients With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study

Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jul 2;171(1):10-18. doi: 10.7326/M18-2937. Epub 2019 Jun 4.

Abstract

Background: Existing guidelines, including Choosing Wisely recommendations, endorse avoiding placement of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Objective: To describe the frequency of and characteristics associated with PICC use in hospitalized patients with stage 3b or greater CKD (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] <45 mL/min/1.73 m2).

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: 52 hospitals participating in the Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium.

Participants: Hospitalized medical patients who received a PICC between November 2013 and September 2016.

Measurements: Percentage of patients receiving PICCs who had CKD, frequency of PICC-related complications, and variation in the proportion of PICCs placed in patients with CKD.

Results: Of 20 545 patients who had PICCs placed, 4743 (23.1% [95% CI, 20.9% to 25.3%]) had an estimated GFR (eGFR) less than 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 699 (3.4%) were receiving hemodialysis. In the intensive care unit (ICU), 30.9% (CI, 29.7% to 32.2%) of patients receiving PICCs had an eGFR less than 45 mL/min/1.73 m2; the corresponding percentage in wards was 19.3% (CI, 18.8% to 19.9%). Among patients with an eGFR less than 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, multilumen PICCs were placed more frequently than single-lumen PICCs. In wards, PICC-related complications occurred in 15.3% of patients with an eGFR less than 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 and in 15.2% of those with an eGFR of 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 or higher. The corresponding percentages in ICU settings were 22.4% and 23.9%. In patients with an eGFR less than 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, PICC placement varied widely across hospitals (interquartile range, 23.7% to 37.8% in ICUs and 12.8% to 23.7% in wards).

Limitation: Nephrologist approval for placement could not be determined, and 2.7% of eGFR values were unknown and excluded.

Conclusion: In this sample of hospitalized patients who received PICCs, placement in those with CKD was common and not concordant with clinical guidelines.

Primary funding source: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and Blue Care Network.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / administration & dosage
  • Catheterization, Central Venous / adverse effects
  • Catheterization, Central Venous / methods*
  • Catheterization, Central Venous / statistics & numerical data*
  • Female
  • Glomerular Filtration Rate
  • Guideline Adherence
  • Hospitalization
  • Humans
  • Infusions, Intravenous
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic / physiopathology
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic / therapy*
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Male
  • Michigan
  • Middle Aged
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Procedures and Techniques Utilization
  • Prospective Studies
  • Renal Dialysis

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents