Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar;46(3):386-394.
doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001967.

Poly-L-Lactic Acid for Minimally Invasive Gluteal Augmentation

Affiliations
Review

Poly-L-Lactic Acid for Minimally Invasive Gluteal Augmentation

Matthew J Lin et al. Dermatol Surg. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Background: There is increased emphasis on the importance of the gluteal region in the perception of beauty. Biodegradable fillers provide a nonsurgical method of augmenting and rejuvenating this area.

Objective: To review pertinent aspects of anatomy, patient evaluation, injection technique, and complications for gluteal augmentation using injectable biodegradable fillers.

Methods: The authors review the literature for poly-L-lactic acid-based gluteal augmentation.

Results: Like many aesthetic procedures, there is a paucity of literature on this emerging treatment modality (Level 4, Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Oxford). However, the collective clinical experience is that poly-L-lactic acid fillers are an effective treatment for patients seeking noninvasive gluteal enhancement with minimal downtime. Physicians must understand gluteal anatomy and avoid injecting deeply in the danger triangle to prevent intravascular injection into the gluteal vessels or injury to the sciatic nerve. Other safety elements include the use of blunt cannulas, reduced pressures, smaller volumes, and retrograde delivery.

Conclusion: Gluteal augmentation with fillers can safely and effectively improve gluteal firmness, shape, proportion, and projection. Practitioners injecting fillers in the gluteal region must be aware of appropriate patient selection, regional anatomy, and safe injection techniques. Given the increasing demand for this procedure, further high-quality studies are needed.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Singh D. Universal allure of the hourglass figure: an evolutionary theory of female physical attractiveness. Clin Plast Surg 2006;33:359–70.
    1. Heidekrueger PI, Sinno S, Tanna N, Szpalski C, et al. The ideal buttock size: a sociodemographic morphometric evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;140:20e–32e.
    1. Wong WW, Motakef S, Lin Y, Gupta SC. Redefining the ideal buttocks: a population analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137:1739–47.
    1. Lewis DMG, Russell EM, Al-Shawaf L, Buss DM. Lumbar curvature: a previously undiscovered standard of attractiveness. Evol Hum Behav 2015;36:345–50.
    1. Hoenig JF, Swetje K. Age-related ptosis of the buttock: an anthropometric gender-specific analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013;37:1090–9.