Industrial perceptions of medicines regulatory harmonization in the East African Community

PLoS One. 2019 Jun 19;14(6):e0218617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218617. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Background: Medicines regulatory harmonization has been recommended as one way to improve access to quality-assured medicines in low- and middle-income countries. The rationale is that by lowering barriers to entry more manufacturers will be enticed to enter the market, while the capacity at the national medicines regulatory authorities is strengthened. The African Medicines Regulatory Harmonization Initiative, agreed in 2009, is developing regional platforms with harmonized regulatory procedures for the registration of medicines. The first region to implement medicines regulatory harmonization was the East African Community (EAC). The harmonization was based on the existing EAC Free Trade Agreement, which officially launched the free movement of goods and services in 2010.

Methods and findings: In this study we conducted semi-structured interviews and performed document reviews. The main target group for our interviews was pharmaceutical companies. We interviewed 18 companies, including 64% of the total companies who had experienced the EAC joint product assessment procedure, and two EAC-based national medicines regulatory authorities. We found that generally pharmaceutical companies are supportive of the African-based MRH efforts and appreciative of the progress being achieved. However, many companies are now hesitant to use the joint product assessment procedure until efficiency improvements are made. Common frustrations were the length of time to receive the actual marketing authorization; unexpectedly higher quality standards than national procedures; and challenges in getting all EAC countries to recognize EAC approvals. Smaller, less attractive markets have not yet become more attractive from a corporate perspective, and there is no free trade of pharmaceuticals in the EAC region.

Conclusions: Pharmaceutical companies agree that medicines regulatory harmonization is the way forward. However, regulatory medicines harmonization must actually result in quicker access to the harmonized markets for quality-assured medicines. At this time, improvements are required to the current EAC processes to meet the vision of harmonization.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Africa, Eastern
  • Attitude*
  • Developing Countries
  • Drug Industry*
  • Drug Utilization / standards*
  • Health Services Accessibility / organization & administration*
  • Health Services Accessibility / standards
  • Regional Medical Programs / organization & administration*
  • Regional Medical Programs / standards

Grants and funding

This study was funded by the Research Council of Norway through the Global Health and Vaccination Programme (GLOBVAC), project number 234608 (LSD, WDO, CÅ). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.