Male principal investigators (almost) don't publish with women in ecology and zoology
- PMID: 31216351
- PMCID: PMC6583967
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218598
Male principal investigators (almost) don't publish with women in ecology and zoology
Erratum in
-
Correction: Male principal investigators (almost) don't publish with women in ecology and zoology.PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233803. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32437463 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Representation of women in science drops substantially at each career stage, from early student to senior investigator. Disparities in opportunities for women to contribute to research metrics, such as distinguished speaker events and authorship, have been reported in many fields in the U.S.A. and Europe. However, whether female representation in scientific contributions differs in other regions, such as Latin America, is not well understood. In this study, in order to determine whether female authorship is influenced by gender or institutional location of the last (senior) author or by subfield within ecology, we gathered author information from 6849 articles in ten ecological and zoological journals that publish research articles either in or out of Latin America. We found that female authorship has risen marginally since 2002 (27 to 31%), and varies among Latin American countries, but not between Latin America and other regions. Last author gender predicted female co-authorship across all journals and regions, as research groups led by women published with over 60% female co-authors whereas those led by men published with less than 20% female co-authors. Our findings suggest that implicit biases and stereotype threats that women face in male-led laboratories could be sources of female withdrawal and leaky pipelines in ecology and zoology. Accordingly, we encourage every PI to self-evaluate their lifetime percentage of female co-authors. Female role models and cultural shifts-especially by male senior authors-are crucial for female retention and unbiased participation in science.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Gender trends in authorship of spine-related academic literature-a 39-year perspective.Spine J. 2017 Nov;17(11):1749-1754. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.041. Epub 2017 Jul 1. Spine J. 2017. PMID: 28673828
-
Gender Differences in the Authorship of Original Research in Pediatric Journals, 2001-2016.J Pediatr. 2017 Dec;191:244-249.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.08.044. Epub 2017 Oct 12. J Pediatr. 2017. PMID: 29033241
-
Women in Neurosurgery: Gender Differences in Authorship in High-Impact Neurosurgery Journals through the Last Two Decades.World Neurosurg. 2020 Jun;138:374-380. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.017. Epub 2020 Mar 19. World Neurosurg. 2020. PMID: 32200013
-
Collaboration Metrics Among Female and Male Researchers: A 5-Year Review of Publications in Major Radiology Journals.Acad Radiol. 2018 Jul;25(7):951-954. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.12.034. Acad Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29887278 Review.
-
[Bibliometry of biological systematics in Latin America during the twentieth century in three global databases].Rev Biol Trop. 2010 Jun;58(2):531-45. Rev Biol Trop. 2010. PMID: 20527457 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Gender shapes the formation of review paper collaborations in microbiology.Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Jul 12;290(2002):20230965. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0965. Epub 2023 Jul 5. Proc Biol Sci. 2023. PMID: 37403511 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Gender differences in animal cognition science.Anim Cogn. 2023 Jul;26(4):1295-1305. doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01777-y. Epub 2023 Apr 18. Anim Cogn. 2023. PMID: 37071241
-
Overcoming the gender bias in ecology and evolution: is the double-anonymized peer review an effective pathway over time?PeerJ. 2023 Apr 10;11:e15186. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15186. eCollection 2023. PeerJ. 2023. PMID: 37065686 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the species name: an analysis of publication trends and biases in taxonomic descriptions of rainfrogs (Amphibia, Strabomantidae, Pristimantis).Zookeys. 2022 Dec 7;1134:73-100. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1134.91348. eCollection 2022. Zookeys. 2022. PMID: 36761112 Free PMC article.
-
Community voices: sowing, germinating, flourishing as strategies to support inclusion in STEM.Nat Commun. 2022 Jun 9;13(1):3219. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30981-6. Nat Commun. 2022. PMID: 35680892 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Monroe K, Ozyurt S, Wrigley T, Alexander A. Gender equality in academia: Bad news from the trenches, and some possible solutions. Perspectives on Politics. 2008;6:215–233.2.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
