Background: Adequate reporting is crucial in full-text publications but even more so in abstracts because they are the most frequently read part of a publication. In 2008, an extension for abstracts of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT-A) statement was published, defining which items should be reported in abstracts of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Therefore, we compared the adherence of RCT abstracts to CONSORT-A before and after the publication of CONSORT-A.
Methods: RCTs published in the five surgical journals with the highest impact factor were identified through PubMed for 2005-2007 and 2014-2016. Adherence to 15 CONSORT-A items and two additional items for abstracts of non-pharmacological trials was assessed in duplicate. We compared the overall adherence to CONSORT-A between the two time periods using an unpaired t test and explored adherence to specific items.
Results: A total of 192 and 164 surgical RCT abstracts were assessed (2005-2007 and 2014-2016, respectively). In the pre-CONSORT-A phase, the mean score of adequately reported items was 6.14 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.90-6.38) and 8.11 in the post-CONSORT-A phase (95% CI 7.83-8.39; mean difference 1.97, 95% CI 1.60-2.34; p < 0.0001). The comparison of individual items indicated a significant improvement in 9 of the 15 items. The three least reported items in the post-CONSORT-A phase were randomization (2.4%), blinding (13.4%), and funding (0.0%). Specific items for non-pharmacological trials were rarely reported (approximately 10%).
Conclusion: The reporting in abstracts of surgical RCTs has improved after the implementation of CONSORT-A. More importantly, there is still ample room for improvement.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials of Periodontal Diseases in Journal Abstracts-A Cross-sectional Survey and Bibliometric Analysis.J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2018 Jun;18(2):130-141.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Sep 21. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2018. PMID: 29747793
Abstracts reporting of HIV/AIDS randomized controlled trials in general medicine and infectious diseases journals: completeness to date and improvement in the quality since CONSORT extension for abstracts.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Oct 13;16(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0243-y. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016. PMID: 27737631 Free PMC article.
Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts: survey of leading general dental journals.J Am Dent Assoc. 2015 Sep;146(9):669-678.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2015.03.020. J Am Dent Assoc. 2015. PMID: 26314976
Improvement in the quality of abstracts in major clinical journals since CONSORT extension for abstracts: a systematic review.Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Jul;38(2):245-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.05.012. Epub 2014 May 23. Contemp Clin Trials. 2014. PMID: 24861557 Review.
Quality improvement in randomized controlled trial abstracts in prosthodontics since the publication of CONSORT guideline for abstracts: a systematic review.J Dent. 2018 May 6:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.04.025. Online ahead of print. J Dent. 2018. PMID: 29742449 Review.
Cited by 1 article
Systematic review of reporting benefits and harms of surgical interventions in randomized clinical trials.BJS Open. 2020 Apr;4(2):171-181. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50240. Epub 2020 Jan 7. BJS Open. 2020. PMID: 32207574 Free PMC article. Review.