Prediction of dosimetric accuracy for VMAT plans using plan complexity parameters via machine learning
- PMID: 31222758
- DOI: 10.1002/mp.13669
Prediction of dosimetric accuracy for VMAT plans using plan complexity parameters via machine learning
Abstract
Purpose: The dosimetric accuracies of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were predicted using plan complexity parameters via machine learning.
Methods: The dataset consisted of 600 cases of clinical VMAT plans from a single institution. The predictor variables (n = 28) for each plan included complexity parameters, machine type, and photon beam energy. Dosimetric measurements were performed using a helical diode array (ArcCHECK), and the dosimetric accuracy of the passing rates for a 5% dose difference (DD5%) and gamma index of 3%/3 mm (γ3%/3 mm) were predicted using three machine learning models: regression tree analysis (RTA), multiple regression analysis (MRA), and neural networks (NNs). First, the prediction models were applied to 500 cases of the VMAT plans. Then, the dosimetric accuracy was predicted using each model for the remaining 100 cases (evaluation dataset). The error between the predicted and measured passing rates was evaluated.
Results: For the 600 cases, the mean ± standard deviation of the measured passing rates was 92.3% ± 9.1% and 96.8% ± 3.1% for DD5% and γ3%/3 mm, respectively. For the evaluation dataset, the mean ± standard deviation of the prediction errors for DD5% and γ3%/3 mm was 0.5% ± 3.0% and 0.6% ± 2.4% for RTA, 0.0% ± 2.9% and 0.5% ± 2.4% for MRA, and -0.2% ± 2.7% and -0.2% ± 2.1% for NN, respectively.
Conclusions: NNs performed slightly better than RTA and MRA in terms of prediction error. These findings may contribute to increasing the efficiency of patient-specific quality-assurance procedures.
Keywords: VMAT; dosimetric accuracy; machine learning models.
© 2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Similar articles
-
Impact of plan parameters on the dosimetric accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy.Med Phys. 2013 Jul;40(7):071718. doi: 10.1118/1.4810969. Med Phys. 2013. PMID: 23822422
-
Dosimetric features-driven machine learning model for DVH prediction in VMAT treatment planning.Med Phys. 2019 Feb;46(2):857-867. doi: 10.1002/mp.13334. Epub 2019 Jan 2. Med Phys. 2019. PMID: 30536442
-
Predicting gamma passing rates for portal dosimetry-based IMRT QA using machine learning.Med Phys. 2019 Oct;46(10):4666-4675. doi: 10.1002/mp.13752. Epub 2019 Aug 27. Med Phys. 2019. PMID: 31386761
-
Knowledge-based planning for intensity-modulated radiation therapy: A review of data-driven approaches.Med Phys. 2019 Jun;46(6):2760-2775. doi: 10.1002/mp.13526. Epub 2019 Apr 24. Med Phys. 2019. PMID: 30963580 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance Tasks and Tools: The Many Roles of Machine Learning.Med Phys. 2020 Jun;47(5):e168-e177. doi: 10.1002/mp.13445. Epub 2019 Mar 4. Med Phys. 2020. PMID: 30768796 Review.
Cited by
-
Prediction of patient-specific quality assurance for volumetric modulated arc therapy using radiomics-based machine learning with dose distribution.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Jan;25(1):e14215. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14215. Epub 2023 Nov 21. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024. PMID: 37987544 Free PMC article.
-
Pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance prediction based on 1D complexity metrics and 3D planning dose: classification, gamma passing rates, and DVH metrics.Radiat Oncol. 2023 Nov 20;18(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s13014-023-02376-4. Radiat Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37986008 Free PMC article.
-
Detecting outliers beyond tolerance limits derived from statistical process control in patient-specific quality assurance.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Feb;25(2):e14154. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14154. Epub 2023 Sep 8. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024. PMID: 37683120 Free PMC article.
-
Study of the prediction of gamma passing rate in dosimetric verification of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using machine learning models based on plan complexity.Front Oncol. 2023 Jul 21;13:1094927. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1094927. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37546404 Free PMC article.
-
Improvement of deep learning prediction model in patient-specific QA for VMAT with MLC leaf position map and patient's dose distribution.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Oct;24(10):e14055. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14055. Epub 2023 Jun 1. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023. PMID: 37261720 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Low DA, Moran JM, Dempsey JF, Dong L, Oldham M. Dosimetry tools and techniques for IMRT. Med Phys. 2011;38:1313-1338.
-
- Letourneau D, Publicover J, Kozelka J, Moseley DJ, Jaffray DA. Novel dosimetric phantom for quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy. Med Phys. 2009;36:1813-1821.
-
- van Elmpt W, McDermott L, Nijsten S, Wendling M, Lambin P, Mijnheer B. A literature review of electronic portal imaging for radiotherapy dosimetry. Radiother Oncol. 2008;88:289-309.
-
- Kry SF, Molineu A, Kerns JR, et al. Institutional patient-specific IMRT QA does not predict unacceptable plan delivery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;90:1195-1201.
-
- Kalet AM, Luk SMH, Phillips MH. Quality assurance tasks and tools: The many roles of machine learning. Med Phys. 2019; in press.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
