Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Jun 5;2(6):e196201.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6201.

Characteristics of Health Care Organizations Associated With Clinician Trust: Results From the Healthy Work Place Study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Characteristics of Health Care Organizations Associated With Clinician Trust: Results From the Healthy Work Place Study

Mark Linzer et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Erratum in

  • Error in Abstract, Text, and Table.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e199999. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9999. JAMA Netw Open. 2019. PMID: 31373642 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: There is new emphasis on clinician trust in health care organizations but little empirical data about the association of trust with clinician satisfaction and retention.

Objective: To examine organizational characteristics associated with trust.

Design, setting, and participants: This prospective cohort study uses data collected from 2012 to 2014 from 34 primary care practices employing physicians (family medicine and general internal medicine) and advanced practice clinicians (nurse practitioners and physician assistants) in the upper Midwest and East Coast of the United States as part of the Healthy Work Place randomized clinical trial. Analyses were performed from 2015 to 2016.

Main outcomes and measures: Clinician trust was measured using a 5-item scale, including belonging, loyalty, safety focus, sense of trust, and responsibility to clinicians in need (range, 1-4, with 1 indicating low and 4 indicating high; Cronbach α = 0.77). Other metrics included work control, work atmosphere (calm to chaotic), organizational culture (cohesiveness, emphases on quality and communication, and values alignment; range, 1-4, with 1 indicating low and 4 indicating high), and clinician stress (range, 1-5, with 1 indicating low and 5 indicating high), satisfaction (range, 1-5, with 1 indicating low and 4 indicating high), burnout (range, 1-5, with 1 indicating no burnout and 5 indicating very high feeling of burnout), and intention to leave (range, 1-5, with 1 indicating no intention to leave and 5 indicating definite intention to leave). Analyses included 2-level hierarchical modeling controlling for age, sex, specialty, and clinician type. Cohen d effect sizes (ESs) were considered small at 0.20, moderate at 0.50, and large at 0.80 or more.

Results: The study included 165 clinicians (mean [SD] age, 47.3 [9.2] years; 86 [52.1%] women). Of these, 143 (87.7%) were physicians and 22 (13.3%) were advanced practice clinicians; 105 clinicians (63.6%) worked in family medicine, and 60 clinicians (36.4%) worked in internal medicine. Compared with clinicians with low levels of trust, clinicians who reported high levels of trust had higher mean (SD) scores for work control (2.49 [0.52] vs 2.18 [0.45]; P < .001), cohesiveness (3.11 [0.46] vs 2.51 [0.51]; P < .001), emphasis on quality vs productivity (3.12 [0.48] vs 2.58 [0.41]; P < .001), emphasis on communication (3.39 [0.41] vs 3.01 [0.44]; P < .001), and values alignment (2.61 [0.59] vs 2.12 [0.52]; P < .001). Men were more likely than women to express loyalty (ES, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.05-0.66; P = .02) and high trust (ES, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.01-0.62; P = .04). Compared with clinicians with low trust at baseline, clinicians with high trust at baseline had a higher mean (SD) satisfaction score (3.99 [0.08] vs 3.51 [0.07]; P < .001; ES, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.39-1.02). Compared with clinicians in whom trust declined or remained low, clinicians with improved or stable high trust reported higher mean (SD) satisfaction (4.01 [0.07] vs 3.43 [0.06]; P < .001; ES, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.66-1.31) and lower stress (3.21 [0.09] vs 3.53 [0.09]; P = .02; ES, -0.39; 95% CI, -0.70 to -0.08) scores and had approximately half the odds of intending to leave (odds ratio, 0.481; 95% CI, 0.241-0.957; P = .04).

Conclusions and relevance: Addressing low levels of trust by improving work control and emphasizing quality, cohesion, communication, and values may improve clinician satisfaction, stress, and retention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Linzer reported grants from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), the American Medical Association, the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, the American College of Physicians, and the Association of Chief and Leaders in General Internal Medicine (paid to Hennepin Healthcare); consulting fees from University of California San Francisco; and honoraria from Brown University and the University of Chicago. Ms Poplau and Drs Grossman and Williams reported grants from AHRQ during the conduct of the study. Dr Varkey reported grants from AHRQ during the conduct of the study and grants from AHRQ outside the submitted work. Dr Sinsky reported serving as the Vice President of Professional Satisfaction for the American Medical Association. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Multilevel Mixed-Effects Ordered Logistic Regression Model for the Association of Trust and Change in Trust With Burnout and Intent to Leave
Burnout categories were scored by clinicians’ own definition of burnout and scored as 1 indicating “I enjoy my work. I have no symptoms of burnout”; 2, “Occasionally, I am under stress, and I don’t always have as much energy as I once did, but I don’t feel burned out”; 3, “I am definitely burning out and have one or more symptoms of burnout, such as physical and emotional exhaustion”; 4, “The symptoms of burnout that I’m experiencing won’t go away. I think about frustrations at work a lot”; and 5, “I feel completely burned out and often wonder if I can go on. I am at the point where I may need some changes or may need to seek some sort of help.” Intent to leave was classified as clinicians’ self-reported likelihood that they will leave their current practice in 2 years, with 1 indicating none; 2, slight; 3, moderate; 4, likely; and 5, definitely.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arrow KJ. Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Am Econ Rev. 1963;53(5):-. - PubMed
    1. Safran DG, Taira DA, Rogers WH, Kosinski M, Ware JE, Tarlov AR. Linking primary care performance to outcomes of care. J Fam Pract. 1998;47(3):213-220. - PubMed
    1. Wright AA, Katz IT. Beyond burnout: redesigning care to restore meaning and sanity for physicians. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(4):309-311. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1716845 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dzau VJ, Kirch DG, Nasca TJ. To care is human: collectively confronting the clinician-burnout crisis. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(4):312-314. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1715127 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rotenstein LS, Torre M, Ramos MA, et al. . Prevalence of burnout among physicians: a systematic review. JAMA. 2018;320(11):1131-1150. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.12777 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms