Septoplasty with or without concurrent turbinate surgery versus non-surgical management for nasal obstruction in adults with a deviated septum: a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 31227374
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30354-X
Septoplasty with or without concurrent turbinate surgery versus non-surgical management for nasal obstruction in adults with a deviated septum: a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Septoplasty (surgical correction of the deviated nasal septum) is the most frequently performed ear, nose, and throat operation in adults, but no randomised controlled trials or non-randomised comparative studies on the effectiveness of septoplasty have been published. Consequently, health-care providers, health insurance companies, and policy makers are concerned about the effectiveness of the procedure. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of septoplasty for nasal obstruction in adults with a deviated septum.
Methods: We did this open, multicentre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial in 16 secondary and two tertiary referral hospitals in the Netherlands. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with nasal obstruction, a deviated septum, and an indication to have septoplasty done were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either septoplasty with or without concurrent turbinate surgery or non-surgical management. Patients were stratified by sex, age (<35 years or ≥35 years), and deviation severity (mild, moderate, or severe). The primary outcome was health-related quality of life, measured with the validated Glasgow Health Status Inventory at 12 months. Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. The trial is registered with the Netherlands Trial Register, number NTR3868.
Findings: Between Sept 2, 2013, and Dec 12, 2016, we randomly assigned 203 participants to receive either septoplasty with or without concurrent turbinate surgery (n=102) or non-surgical management (n=101). 189 participants were analysed at 12 months. At 12 months, mean score on the Glasgow Health Status Inventory of patients assigned to septoplasty was 72·2 (SD 12·2) and for those assigned to non-surgical management was 63·9 (SD 14·5, mean difference 8·3 [95% CI 4·5-12·1], favouring septoplasty). Septal abscess occurred in one surgical patient and septal perforation in two surgical patients. No side-effects of nasal medication were reported.
Interpretation: Septoplasty is more effective than non-surgical management for nasal obstruction in adults with a deviated septum. This effect was sustained up to 24 months of follow-up.
Funding: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw).
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Septoplasty-a surgical or political challenge?Lancet. 2019 Jul 27;394(10195):276-278. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31241-3. Epub 2019 Jun 18. Lancet. 2019. PMID: 31227372 No abstract available.
-
Septoplasty for nasal obstruction.Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):493-494. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33012-0. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 32061291 No abstract available.
-
Septoplasty for nasal obstruction.Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):493. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33013-2. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 32061292 No abstract available.
-
Septoplasty for nasal obstruction.Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):494. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33014-4. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 32061293 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of septoplasty compared to medical management in adults with obstruction associated with a deviated nasal septum: the NAIROS RCT.Health Technol Assess. 2024 Mar;28(10):1-213. doi: 10.3310/MVFR4028. Health Technol Assess. 2024. PMID: 38477237 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness of septoplasty versus non-surgical management for nasal obstruction due to a deviated nasal septum in adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2015 Nov 4;16:500. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1031-4. Trials. 2015. PMID: 26537948 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Nasal Airway Obstruction Study (NAIROS): a phase III, open-label, mixed-methods, multicentre randomised controlled trial of septoplasty versus medical management of a septal deviation with nasal obstruction.Trials. 2020 Feb 13;21(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4081-1. Trials. 2020. PMID: 32054508 Free PMC article.
-
Septoplasty for nasal obstruction due to a deviated nasal septum in adults: a systematic review.Rhinology. 2018 Sep 1;56(3):195-208. doi: 10.4193/Rhin18.016. Rhinology. 2018. PMID: 29656301 Review.
-
Reducing Surgical Risks for Septal and Turbinate Surgery.Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2023 May;31(2):221-226. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2023.01.010. Epub 2023 Feb 26. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2023. PMID: 37001925 Review.
Cited by
-
Septoplasty versus non-surgical management for deviated nasal septum: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Sep 4. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08937-x. Online ahead of print. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 39230606 Review.
-
The Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) Questionnaire in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 8;13(16):4642. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164642. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39200785 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Septoplasty and Nasal Packs From Otolaryngologists' Perspectives: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Cureus. 2024 Feb 22;16(2):e54691. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54691. eCollection 2024 Feb. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38523933 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of septoplasty compared to medical management in adults with obstruction associated with a deviated nasal septum: the NAIROS RCT.Health Technol Assess. 2024 Mar;28(10):1-213. doi: 10.3310/MVFR4028. Health Technol Assess. 2024. PMID: 38477237 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical effectiveness of septoplasty versus medical management for nasal airways obstruction: multicentre, open label, randomised controlled trial.BMJ. 2023 Oct 18;383:e075445. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-075445. BMJ. 2023. PMID: 37852641 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
