Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Aug;24(4):671-682.
doi: 10.1007/s40519-019-00735-3. Epub 2019 Jun 21.

Shedding light upon various tools to assess orthorexia nervosa: a critical literature review with a systematic search

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

Shedding light upon various tools to assess orthorexia nervosa: a critical literature review with a systematic search

Martina Valente et al. Eat Weight Disord. 2019 Aug.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this literature review was to identify the tools developed and used to assess orthorexia nervosa (ON).

Methods: A systematic search was executed in PubMed, Biomed Central, and PsycINFO. The final list included 70 articles that were critically analyzed.

Results: A total of six tools were reported to assess ON: the BOT, the ORTO-15, the EHQ, the DOS, the BOS, and the TOS. The tools were based upon different conceptualizations of ON and of its diagnostic criteria. Although they were different, all the conceptualizations derived from the initial definition of ON provided by Bratman in 1997. None of the methodologies adopted for tool construction considered end users or client perspectives and, when carried out, the validations of the tools were fragmented and often based on specific populations.

Conclusion: This study may be a starting point for the construction of a new diagnostic tool for ON. Starting from the methodological weaknesses identified by this review, it was possible to derive some suggestions for future research: (a) developing a modern re-conceptualization of ON, comprehensive of end-user perspectives; (b) adopting qualitative data collection techniques to gain insights into how to diagnose ON; and (c) actively involving diverse stakeholders for constructing a new tool.

Level of evidence: Level of Evidence: I, systematic review.

Keywords: Assessment; Diagnosis; Eating behavior; Orthorexia nervosa; Psychometrics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of articles identification and inclusion

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bratman S (1997) Health food junkie. Yoga J September/October: 42–50
    1. Donini LM, Marsili D, Graziani MP, Imbriale M, Cannella C. Orthorexia nervosa: a preliminary study with a proposal for diagnosis and an attempt to measure the dimension of the phenomenon. Eat Weight Disord. 2004;9:151. - PubMed
    1. Bratman S. Orthorexia vs. theories of healthy eating. Eat Weight Disord. 2017;22:381. - PubMed
    1. Moroze RM, Dunn TM, Holland JC, Yager J, Weintraub P. Microthinking about micronutrients: a case of transition from obsessions about healthy eating to near-fatal “orthorexia nervosa” and proposed diagnostic criteria. Psychosomatics. 2015;56(4):397–403. - PubMed
    1. Koven NS, Abry AW. The clinical basis of orthorexia nervosa: emerging perspectives. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015;11:385–394. - PMC - PubMed