Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 6 (1), 26

Anteversion and Length of the Femoral Tunnel in ACL Reconstruction: In-Vivo Comparison Between Rigid and Flexible Instrumentation

Affiliations

Anteversion and Length of the Femoral Tunnel in ACL Reconstruction: In-Vivo Comparison Between Rigid and Flexible Instrumentation

Frank Wein et al. J Exp Orthop.

Abstract

Background: Due to it being tangential to the distal femoral axis, the anteromedial portal presents significant risk of causing iatrogenic damage, and of producing tunnels that are too short for optimal osseointegration. Flexible reamers were developed to eliminate the need for knee hyperflexion and offer better-controlled orientation of the femoral tunnel. We aimed to compare the anteversion and length of femoral tunnels drilled using flexible reamers to those drilled using rigid reamers.

Methods: Between May 2012 and December 2013, all patients receiving ACL reconstruction performed by one surgeon were operated on using either a rigid or a flexible reamer from the same supplier (Versi-Tomic® system, Stryker, Kalamazoo, Michigan). The height of each patient was recorded, and the length and anteversion of the femoral tunnels were measured intra-operatively and on true lateral radiographs, respectively.

Results: Thirty-seven patients underwent operations using the rigid instrumentation, and 43 using the flexible instrumentation. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in either sex or height (p = n.s.). The patients operated on using the rigid instrumentation had tunnels anteverted by 18.6° ± 6° and 33.6 ± 2.9 mm long. Those operated on using the flexible instrumentation had tunnels anteverted by 40° ± 2° and 41.1 ± 3.57 mm long. Both anteversion and tunnel length were significantly greater for tunnels drilled using the flexible instrumentation (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that flexible reamers produce significantly more anteverted and longer femoral tunnels during ACL reconstruction than rigid reamers. Clinical studies remain necessary to assess the outcomes of ACL reconstruction using flexible reamers.

Keywords: ACL; Anteromedial portal; Femoral tunnel; Flexible reamer.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Images of the Versi-Tomic® system with rigid (a) and flexible (b) reamers
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Intraoperative measurement of tunnel length
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Measurement of femoral tunnel anteversion on true lateral postoperative radiographs. Anteversion is the angle between the posterior cortex of the femoral diaphysis and the line running long the middle of the femoral tunnel ending at the endobutton

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Alentorn-Geli E, Stuart JJ, Choi JH, Toth AP, Moorman CT, 3rd, Taylor DC. Inside-out Antegrade Tibial tunnel drilling through the posterolateral portal using a flexible reamer in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc Tech. 2015;4(5):e537–e544. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2015.05.016. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dargel J, Schmidt-Wiethoff R, Fischer S, Mader K, Koebke J, Schneider T. Femoral bone tunnel placement using the transtibial tunnel or the anteromedial portal in ACL reconstruction: a radiographic evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(3):220–227. doi: 10.1007/s00167-008-0639-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dejour D, La Barbera G, Pasqualotto S, Valoroso M, Nover L, Reynolds R, Saffarini M. Sagittal plane corrections around the knee. J Knee Surg. 2017;30(8):736–745. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1603637. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Farrow LD, Liu RW. Lateral anatomic structures at risk during transepiphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2010;23(4):209–213. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1271889. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Franceschi F, Papalia R, Rizzello G, Del Buono A, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Anteromedial portal versus transtibial drilling techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: any clinical relevance? A retrospective comparative study. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(8):1330–1337. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.05.020. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback