A 266 Patient Experience of a Quaternary Care Referral Center for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation with Assessment of Outcomes for Transferred Versus In-House Patients

Abstract

Objective: Patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) require highly trained specialists and resources to be cared for safely. Interestingly, comparisons of outcomes for patients cannulated for VA-ECMO by outside institutions and transferred to referral centers for further care versus those cannulated and taken care of in house at the referral center have not been reported on a large scale. This study aimed to perform the first comparison of these 2 populations based on the experience of a single quaternary referral center.

Design: A retrospective chart review-based study in a single quaternary care center of patients cannulated by referring institutions for VA-ECMO then transferred versus patients who were cannulated in house was performed to assess for a difference in survival (both of ECMO therapy and survival to discharge).

Setting: Single quaternary academic referral center for ECMO.

Participants: All patients undergoing VA-ECMO who were at least 18 years old from 2011-2018 (266 patients).

Intervention: None.

Measurements and main results: The study comprised 215 patients cannulated for VA-ECMO in house and 51 patients cannulated by 17 different outside institutions then transferred. Survival of the ECMO run for in-house patients (122/215) was 56.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 50.1-63.3), and survival of transferred patients (31/51) for the ECMO run was 60.8% (95% CI 47.4-74.2; p = 0.58). Survival to discharge in patients cannulated in house (82/215) was 38.1% (95% CI 31.6-44.6) and for outside hospital transfers (24/51 patients) was 47.1% (95% CI 33.4-60.8; p = 0.23).

Conclusions: This retrospective chart review of 266 patients found no difference in survival of the ECMO therapy or survival to discharge in patients cannulated by other institutions and transferred versus those who were cannulated in house. Even though analysis on the feasibility of transfer centers has been performed extensively in patients with respiratory failure requiring venovenous ECMO, minimal investigation has been performed in patients requiring VA-ECMO. These results should be considered hypothesis-generating because larger sample sizes are necessary to guide care of these patients more definitively.

Keywords: extracorporeal life support; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; outside hospital extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; transferred patients.