Variation in the Desire for Cleft Revision Surgery among Children, Caregivers, and Surgeons
- PMID: 31246825
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005722
Variation in the Desire for Cleft Revision Surgery among Children, Caregivers, and Surgeons
Abstract
Background: Although revision surgery is part of the reconstructive process for children with cleft lip and/or cleft palate, the indications for revision vary, and the extent to which surgeons and families agree on appearance is unclear. The authors sought to understand the extent to which children with cleft lip and/or cleft palate, surgeons, caregivers, and control observers agree on satisfaction with appearance and the desire for revision.
Methods: Children with cleft lip and/or cleft palate (n = 100) and their caregivers (n = 100) were surveyed regarding satisfaction with appearance using the Cleft Evaluation Profile. Surgeons (n = 10) and control observers (n = 10) rated photographs of these children using questions analogous to the Cleft Evaluation Profile. General linear model repeated measures analysis of variance were used to detect significant differences between raters, with an alpha of 0.05.
Results: The children reported greater satisfaction with appearance across all domains compared with surgeons (nose, 7.77 versus 5.51, p < 0.001; lip, 7.94 versus 5.90, p < 0.001; maxilla, 8.16 versus 6.56, p < 0.001) and general observers (nose, 7.78 versus 6.00, p < 0.001; lip, 7.80 versus 6.12, p < 0.001; maxilla, 8.16 versus 7.40, p < 0.001). Children and caregivers expressed similar degrees of satisfaction with appearance of the lip (5.48 ± 1.69 versus 5.6 ± 1.49, p > 0.5) and maxilla (6.08 ± 1.1 versus 5.8 ± 1.2, p = 0.07). There was no significant relationship between children and surgeons in terms of the desire for revision surgery (p = 0.44).
Conclusions: All groups expressed differing levels of satisfaction with cleft-specific aspects of appearance. Importantly, children were more satisfied than all other groups. Care must be taken to evaluate perceptions of all stakeholders before moving forward with cleft revision surgery.
Similar articles
-
Caregiver-Reported Outcomes and Barriers to Care among Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Dec;142(6):884e-891e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004987. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018. PMID: 30489528 Free PMC article.
-
Health-Related Quality of Life and the Desire for Revision Surgery Among Children With Cleft Lip and Palate.J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Oct;27(7):1689-1693. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002924. J Craniofac Surg. 2016. PMID: 27464565
-
The Cleft Aesthetic Rating Scale for 18-Year-Old Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: A Tool for Nasolabial Aesthetics Assessment.Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 Aug;55(7):1006-1012. doi: 10.1597/16-123. Epub 2018 Feb 22. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018. PMID: 27996297
-
High patient satisfaction after secondary rhinoplasty in cleft lip patients.Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2011 May-Jun;1(3):167-72. doi: 10.1002/alr.20023. Epub 2011 Apr 28. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2011. PMID: 22287367
-
Comparative effectiveness studies examining patient-reported outcomes among children with cleft lip and/or palate: a systematic review.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jan;135(1):198-211. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000825. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015. PMID: 25539306 Review.
Cited by
-
Patient- and 3D morphometry-based nose outcomes after skeletofacial reconstruction.Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 6;10(1):4246. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61233-6. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32144392 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Monson LA, Khechoyan DY, Buchanan EP, Hollier LH Jr. Secondary lip and palate surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2014;41:301–309.
-
- Li W, Steinbacher DM. Unilateral cleft lip revision with conversion to the modified inferior triangle. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:353e–361e.
-
- Sitzman TJ, Coyne SM, Britto MT. The burden of care for children with unilateral cleft lip: A systematic review of revision surgery. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016;53:84–94.
-
- Mackay D, Mazahari M, Graham WP, et al. Incidence of operative procedures on cleft lip and palate patients. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;42:445–448.
-
- Cohen M. Residual deformities after repair of clefts of the lip and palate. Clin Plast Surg. 2004;31:331–345.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
