Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul;144(1):171-178.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005722.

Variation in the Desire for Cleft Revision Surgery among Children, Caregivers, and Surgeons

Affiliations

Variation in the Desire for Cleft Revision Surgery among Children, Caregivers, and Surgeons

Kavitha Ranganathan et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Although revision surgery is part of the reconstructive process for children with cleft lip and/or cleft palate, the indications for revision vary, and the extent to which surgeons and families agree on appearance is unclear. The authors sought to understand the extent to which children with cleft lip and/or cleft palate, surgeons, caregivers, and control observers agree on satisfaction with appearance and the desire for revision.

Methods: Children with cleft lip and/or cleft palate (n = 100) and their caregivers (n = 100) were surveyed regarding satisfaction with appearance using the Cleft Evaluation Profile. Surgeons (n = 10) and control observers (n = 10) rated photographs of these children using questions analogous to the Cleft Evaluation Profile. General linear model repeated measures analysis of variance were used to detect significant differences between raters, with an alpha of 0.05.

Results: The children reported greater satisfaction with appearance across all domains compared with surgeons (nose, 7.77 versus 5.51, p < 0.001; lip, 7.94 versus 5.90, p < 0.001; maxilla, 8.16 versus 6.56, p < 0.001) and general observers (nose, 7.78 versus 6.00, p < 0.001; lip, 7.80 versus 6.12, p < 0.001; maxilla, 8.16 versus 7.40, p < 0.001). Children and caregivers expressed similar degrees of satisfaction with appearance of the lip (5.48 ± 1.69 versus 5.6 ± 1.49, p > 0.5) and maxilla (6.08 ± 1.1 versus 5.8 ± 1.2, p = 0.07). There was no significant relationship between children and surgeons in terms of the desire for revision surgery (p = 0.44).

Conclusions: All groups expressed differing levels of satisfaction with cleft-specific aspects of appearance. Importantly, children were more satisfied than all other groups. Care must be taken to evaluate perceptions of all stakeholders before moving forward with cleft revision surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Monson LA, Khechoyan DY, Buchanan EP, Hollier LH Jr. Secondary lip and palate surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2014;41:301–309.
    1. Li W, Steinbacher DM. Unilateral cleft lip revision with conversion to the modified inferior triangle. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:353e–361e.
    1. Sitzman TJ, Coyne SM, Britto MT. The burden of care for children with unilateral cleft lip: A systematic review of revision surgery. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016;53:84–94.
    1. Mackay D, Mazahari M, Graham WP, et al. Incidence of operative procedures on cleft lip and palate patients. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;42:445–448.
    1. Cohen M. Residual deformities after repair of clefts of the lip and palate. Clin Plast Surg. 2004;31:331–345.

LinkOut - more resources