Lung Cancer Screening Utilization: A Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Analysis
- PMID: 31248742
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.03.015
Lung Cancer Screening Utilization: A Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the U.S. The National Lung Screening Trial found that low-dose computed tomography reduced lung cancer mortality in high-risk individuals. As a result, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force began recommending low-dose computed tomography screening for those at a high risk in 2013. Therefore, it is imperative to continually monitor lung cancer screening uptake. The objective of this study was to determine computed tomography screening uptake across ten states using 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey data.
Methods: In fall 2018, a cross-sectional analysis was performed on survey data from 4,374 low-dose computed tomography-eligible participants, as determined by Task Force recommendations. Weighted percentages were calculated to assess computed tomography screening utilization overall and by state, sociodemographic, and clinical characteristics; Wald chi-squared tests evaluated group differences.
Results: Within the study sample, 14.4% of eligible individuals had a computed tomography scan to test for lung cancer within the past 12 months. Significant state-to-state variation was identified (6.5% utilization in Nevada to 18.1% in Florida, p=0.03). Screening utilization was higher among individuals with insurance than among the uninsured (15.2% vs 4.0%, p<0.001), and it was higher among individuals with asthma (22.9% vs 12.9%, p=0.006) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (23.7% vs 8.5%, p<0.001) than among those without either condition.
Conclusions: Computed tomography screening utilization was higher than in earlier estimates. However, further research is needed to elucidate geographic variation in screening.
Copyright © 2019 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the characteristics of the population eligible for lung cancer screening under 2013 and population newly eligible under 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Sep;35(9):1233-1243. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01880-6. Epub 2024 May 8. Cancer Causes Control. 2024. PMID: 38717723 Free PMC article.
-
Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility and Utilization Among Transgender Patients: An Analysis of the 2017-2018 United States Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey.Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Dec 12;22(12):2164-2169. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa127. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020. PMID: 32623455
-
Prediction of Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Using Simplified Criteria.Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Oct;16(10):1280-1285. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201903-239OC. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019. PMID: 31298946
-
The United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations for lung cancer screening.Thorac Surg Clin. 2015 May;25(2):199-203. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2014.12.004. Epub 2015 Feb 10. Thorac Surg Clin. 2015. PMID: 25901563 Review.
-
Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography: an analysis of the MEDCAC decision.J Thorac Imaging. 2015 Jan;30(1):15-23. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000119. J Thorac Imaging. 2015. PMID: 25286290 Review.
Cited by
-
The TELEhealth Shared decision-making COaching and navigation in Primary carE (TELESCOPE) intervention: a study protocol for delivering shared decision-making for lung cancer screening by patient navigators.BMC Prim Care. 2024 Oct 18;25(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02610-2. BMC Prim Care. 2024. PMID: 39425032 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluating disparity of subjective cognitive decline between male veterans and non-veterans in the United States using propensity score matching estimation: A behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey cross-sectional study.PLoS One. 2024 Sep 13;19(9):e0310102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310102. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39269972 Free PMC article.
-
Characteristics associated with early vs. late adoption of lung cancer screening.Prev Med Rep. 2024 Jul 7;44:102820. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102820. eCollection 2024 Aug. Prev Med Rep. 2024. PMID: 39099771 Free PMC article.
-
Estimating the Effects of Cancer Screening in Clinical Practice Settings: The Role of Selective Uptake and Suboptimal Adherence along the Cancer Screening Continuum.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Aug 1;33(8):984-988. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-1491. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024. PMID: 39012954
-
Patient Lung Cancer Screening Decisions and Environmental and Psychosocial Factors.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2412880. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12880. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38819825 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous

