Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent: systematic review and network meta-analysis
- PMID: 31253632
- PMCID: PMC6595429
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l2222
Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent: systematic review and network meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of standard term (12 months) or long term (>12 months) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) versus short term (<6 months) DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES).
Design: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Data sources: Relevant studies published between June 1983 and April 2018 from Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library for clinical trials, PubMed, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Clinicaltrialsregister.eu.
Review methods: Randomised controlled trials comparing two of the three durations of DAPT (short term, standard term, and long term) after PCI with DES were included. The primary study outcomes were cardiac or non-cardiac death, all cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and all bleeding events.
Results: 17 studies (n=46 864) were included. Compared with short term DAPT, network meta-analysis showed that long term DAPT resulted in higher rates of major bleeding (odds ratio 1.78, 95% confidence interval 1.27 to 2.49) and non-cardiac death (1.63, 1.03 to 2.59); standard term DAPT was associated with higher rates of any bleeding (1.39, 1.01 to 1.92). No noticeable difference was observed in other primary endpoints. The sensitivity analysis revealed that the risks of non-cardiac death and bleeding were further increased for ≥18 months of DAPT compared with short term or standard term DAPT. In the subgroup analysis, long term DAPT led to higher all cause mortality than short term DAPT in patients implanted with newer-generation DES (1.99, 1.04 to 3.81); short term DAPT presented similar efficacy and safety to standard term DAPT with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) presentation and newer-generation DES placement. The heterogeneity of pooled trials was low, providing more confidence in the interpretation of results.
Conclusions: In patients with all clinical presentations, compared with short term DAPT (clopidogrel), long term DAPT led to higher rates of major bleeding and non-cardiac death, and standard term DAPT was associated with an increased risk of any bleeding. For patients with ACS, short term DAPT presented similar efficacy and safety with standard term DAPT. For patients implanted with newer-generation DES, long term DAPT resulted in more all cause mortality than short term DAPT. Although the optimal duration of DAPT should take personal ischaemic and bleeding risks into account, this study suggested short term DAPT could be considered for most patients after PCI with DES, combining evidence from both direct and indirect comparisons.
Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018099519.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: support from the Major Science and Technology Project of Hunan Province, The National Natural Science Foundation of China, and National Key Research and Development Projects for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Figures
Comment in
-
Review: After PCI with DESs, long- and standard-term DAPT increase some adverse outcomes vs short-term DAPT.Ann Intern Med. 2019 Nov 19;171(10):JC54. doi: 10.7326/ACPJ201911190-054. Ann Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 31739337 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy and safety of short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (≤6 months) after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Clin Cardiol. 2018 Nov;41(11):1455-1462. doi: 10.1002/clc.23075. Epub 2018 Nov 20. Clin Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 30225978 Free PMC article.
-
Benefits of short-term or prolonged as compared to standard 1 year DAPT in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of 9 randomized trials.J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 Aug;50(2):337-354. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-02033-2. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020. PMID: 31919736
-
Comparison of biodegradable and newer generation durable polymer drug-eluting stents with short-term dual antiplatelet therapy: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized trials comprising of 43,875 patients.J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2022 Apr;53(3):671-682. doi: 10.1007/s11239-021-02628-8. Epub 2022 Jan 4. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2022. PMID: 34981305
-
Three, six, or twelve months of dual antiplatelet therapy after DES implantation in patients with or without acute coronary syndromes: an individual patient data pairwise and network meta-analysis of six randomized trials and 11 473 patients.Eur Heart J. 2017 Apr 7;38(14):1034-1043. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw627. Eur Heart J. 2017. PMID: 28110296 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Systematic Review for the 2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 6;68(10):1116-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.512. Epub 2016 Mar 29. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 27036919 Review.
Cited by
-
An overview of decision-making in cerebrovascular treatment strategies: Part II - Ruptured aneurysms.Brain Spine. 2024 Sep 6;4:103330. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.103330. eCollection 2024. Brain Spine. 2024. PMID: 39318854 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Regulatory science promotes the translation of transcatheter tricuspid valve repair/replacement devices.Regen Biomater. 2024 Jul 18;11:rbae084. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbae084. eCollection 2024. Regen Biomater. 2024. PMID: 39220742 Free PMC article.
-
One-Month Duration Compared with Twelve-Month Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Elective Angioplasty for Coronary Artery Disease: Bleeding and Ischaemic Outcomes.J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 2;13(15):4521. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154521. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39124787 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Short-Term DAPT and Long-Term DAPT on the Prognosis of PCI Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 26;23(10):326. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2310326. eCollection 2022 Oct. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 39077148 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of drugs in residual cardiovascular risk: A systematic review of the literature.Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2024 Jun 15;22:200298. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2024.200298. eCollection 2024 Sep. Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2024. PMID: 38983606 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, et al. ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: The Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2017;2017. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, et al. 2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:1082-115. 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.513. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Gwon HC, Hahn JY, Park KW, et al. Six-month versus 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents: the Efficacy of Xience/Promus Versus Cypher to Reduce Late Loss After Stenting (EXCELLENT) randomized, multicenter study. Circulation 2012;125:505-13. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.059022. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous