Trends in Treatment of T1N0 Esophageal Cancer
- PMID: 31274653
- PMCID: PMC6980302
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003466
Trends in Treatment of T1N0 Esophageal Cancer
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore nationwide trends in treatment and outcomes of T1N0 esophageal cancer.
Background: Endoscopic treatment has become an accepted option for early-stage esophageal cancer, but nationwide utilization rates and outcomes are unknown.
Methods: T1N0 esophageal cancers were identified in the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2014. We assessed trends in treatment; compared endoscopic therapy, esophagectomy, chemoradiation, and no treatment; and performed a subgroup analysis of T1a and T1b patients from 2010 to 2014 (AJCC 7).
Results: A total of 12,383 patients with clinical T1N0 esophageal cancer were analyzed. Over a decade, use of endoscopic therapy increased from 12.7% to 33.6%, whereas chemoradiation and esophagectomy decreased, P < 0.01. The rise in endoscopic treatment of T1a disease from 42.7% to 50.6% was accompanied by a decrease in esophagectomies from 21.7% to 12.8% (P < 0.01). For T1b disease, the rise in endoscopic treatment from 16.9% to 25.1% (P = 0.03) was accompanied by decreases in no treatment and chemoradiation, whereas the rate of esophagectomies remained approximately 50%. Unadjusted median survival was longer for patients undergoing resection: esophagectomy, 98.6 months; endoscopic therapy, 77.7 months; chemoradiation, 17.3 months; no treatment, 8.2 months; P < 0.01. Risk-adjusted Cox modeling showed esophagectomy was associated with improved survival [hazard ratio (HR): 0.85], and chemoradiation (HR: 1.79) and no treatment (HR: 3.57) with decreased survival, compared to endoscopic therapy (P < 0.01).
Conclusions: Use of endoscopic therapy for T1 esophageal cancer has increased significantly: for T1a, as an alternative to esophagectomy; and for T1b, as an alternative to no treatment or chemoradiation. Despite upfront risks, long-term survival is highest for patients who can undergo esophagectomy.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Esophagectomy Timing After Neoadjuvant Therapy for Distal Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Mar;101(3):1123-30. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.044. Epub 2015 Dec 1. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016. PMID: 26652139
-
Definitive or Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: Patterns of Care and Survival Outcomes.Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jun;101(6):2148-54. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.12.056. Epub 2016 Mar 24. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016. PMID: 27016842
-
Management of Clinical T1N0M0 Esophageal Cancer.Gut Liver. 2019 May 15;13(3):315-324. doi: 10.5009/gnl18254. Gut Liver. 2019. PMID: 30600672 Free PMC article.
-
What Constitutes Optimal Management of T1N0 Esophageal Adenocarcinoma?Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Mar;26(3):714-731. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-07118-5. Epub 2019 Jan 3. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30607765 Review.
-
Optimal Use of Combined Modality Therapy in the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer.Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2017 Jul;26(3):405-429. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 May 11. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2017. PMID: 28576180 Review.
Cited by
-
Endoscopic therapy versus esophagectomy for T1bN0M0 esophageal cancer: A population-based study using propensity score matching.Heliyon. 2023 Nov 10;9(11):e22189. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22189. eCollection 2023 Nov. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 38045191 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the Management of Gastric Tube Cancers After Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review.Cureus. 2023 Jun 16;15(6):e40526. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40526. eCollection 2023 Jun. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37461759 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical models to predict lymph nodes metastasis and distant metastasis in newly diagnosed early esophageal cancer patients: A population-based study.Cancer Med. 2023 Mar;12(5):5275-5292. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5334. Epub 2022 Oct 7. Cancer Med. 2023. PMID: 36205033 Free PMC article.
-
Today's Mistakes and Tomorrow's Wisdom… in the Management of T1b Barrett's Adenocarcinoma.Visc Med. 2022 Jun;38(3):196-202. doi: 10.1159/000524285. Epub 2022 Apr 25. Visc Med. 2022. PMID: 35814972 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Chemoradiotherapy With or Without Consolidation Chemotherapy Versus Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Consolidation Chemotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Front Oncol. 2022 May 23;12:813021. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.813021. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35677167 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Shaheen NJ, Sharma P, Overholt BF, et al. Radiofrequency ablation in Barrett’s esophagus with dysplasia. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2277–2288. - PubMed
-
- Hu Y, Puri V, Shami VM, et al. Comparative effectiveness of esophagectomy versus endoscopic treatment for esophageal high-grade dysplasia. Ann Surg. 2016;263:719–726. - PubMed
-
- Farjah F, Gerdes H, Gibson M, et al. NCCN Guidelines Version 2.2018 Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers NCCN Evidence BlocksTM. Available at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/esophageal_blocks.pdf. 2018. Accessed October 17, 2018.
-
- Wani S, Qumseya B, Sultan S, et al. Endoscopic eradication therapy for patients with Barrett’s esophagus-associated dysplasia and intramucosal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87 907–931.e9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
