A Methodology For Studying Organizational Performance: A Multistate Survey of Front-line Providers
- PMID: 31274782
- PMCID: PMC6690788
- DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001167
A Methodology For Studying Organizational Performance: A Multistate Survey of Front-line Providers
Abstract
Background: Rigorous measurement of organizational performance requires large, unbiased samples to allow inferences to the population. Studies of organizations, including hospitals, often rely on voluntary surveys subject to nonresponse bias. For example, hospital administrators with concerns about performance are more likely to opt-out of surveys about organizational quality and safety, which is problematic for generating inferences.
Objective: The objective of this study was to describe a novel approach to obtaining a representative sample of organizations using individuals nested within organizations, and demonstrate how resurveying nonrespondents can allay concerns about bias from low response rates at the individual-level.
Methods: We review and analyze common ways of surveying hospitals. We describe the approach and results of a double-sampling technique of surveying nurses as informants about hospital quality and performance. Finally, we provide recommendations for sampling and survey methods to increase response rates and evaluate whether and to what extent bias exists.
Results: The survey of nurses yielded data on over 95% of hospitals in the sampling frame. Although the nurse response rate was 26%, comparisons of nurses' responses in the main survey and those of resurveyed nonrespondents, which yielded nearly a 90% response rate, revealed no statistically significant differences at the nurse-level, suggesting no evidence of nonresponse bias.
Conclusions: Surveying organizations via random sampling of front-line providers can avoid the self-selection issues caused by directly sampling organizations. Response rates are commonly misinterpreted as a measure of representativeness; however, findings from the double-sampling approach show how low response rates merely increase the potential for nonresponse bias but do not confirm it.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Do Differential Response Rates to Patient Surveys Between Organizations Lead to Unfair Performance Comparisons?: Evidence From the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey.Med Care. 2016 Jan;54(1):45-54. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000457. Med Care. 2016. PMID: 26595223 Free PMC article.
-
A two-phase sampling survey for nonresponse and its paradata to correct nonresponse bias in a health surveillance survey.Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2017 Feb;65(1):71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2016.10.059. Epub 2017 Jan 17. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2017. PMID: 28104317
-
The culture of safety: results of an organization-wide survey in 15 California hospitals.Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Apr;12(2):112-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.2.112. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003. PMID: 12679507 Free PMC article.
-
Refinement of the HCUP Quality Indicators.Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2001 May. Report No.: 01-0035. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2001 May. Report No.: 01-0035. PMID: 20734520 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Implementing action research in hospital settings: a systematic review.J Health Organ Manag. 2015;29(6):729-49. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-09-2013-0203. J Health Organ Manag. 2015. PMID: 26394255 Review.
Cited by
-
Variation in organisational factors across high- and low-performing hospitals with regard to spontaneous vaginal birth for Black women in four states: a cross-sectional descriptive study.BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 4;14(11):e082421. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082421. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39496370 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 Mortality Disparities Among Socially Vulnerable Medicare Beneficiaries Associated With the Quality of Nurse Work Environments in U.S. Hospitals.Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241284959. doi: 10.1177/00469580241284959. Inquiry. 2024. PMID: 39323090 Free PMC article.
-
Hospital nurse staffing variation and Covid-19 deaths: A cross-sectional study.Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Oct;158:104830. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104830. Epub 2024 Jun 7. Int J Nurs Stud. 2024. PMID: 38917747
-
Validation of a short form of the practice environment scale of the nursing work index: The PES-5.Res Nurs Health. 2024 Aug;47(4):450-459. doi: 10.1002/nur.22388. Epub 2024 Apr 26. Res Nurs Health. 2024. PMID: 38669131
-
Hospital Performance on Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and System Ratings: Associations With Nursing Factors.Med Care. 2024 May 1;62(5):288-295. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001966. Epub 2024 Apr 5. Med Care. 2024. PMID: 38579145
References
-
- Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:1129–1136. - PubMed
-
- National Research Council (NRC). Tourangeau R, Plewes TJ, eds. Nonresponse in social science surveys: a research agenda. Panel on a Research Agenda for the Future of Social Science Data Collection, Committee on National Statistics Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013:1–166.
-
- Spetz J, Cimiotti JP, Brunell ML. Improving collection and use of interprofessional health workforce data: Progress and peril. Nurs Outlook. 2016;64:377–384. - PubMed
-
- Nathan G, Holt D. The effect of survey design on regression analysis. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1980;42:377–386.
-
- Holbrook A, Krosnick J, Pfent A, eds. The causes and consequences of response rates in surveys by the news media and government contractor survey research firms In: Lepkowski J, Tucker C, Brinck JM, De Leeuw E, Japec L, Lavrakas P, Link M, Sangster R, eds. Advances in Telephone Survey Methodology. New York, NY: Wiley; 2008:499–678.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
