Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov;58(11):761-768.
doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1622041. Epub 2019 Jul 8.

Risk assessment of recordable occupational hearing loss in the mining industry

Affiliations

Risk assessment of recordable occupational hearing loss in the mining industry

Kan Sun et al. Int J Audiol. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the hearing loss risk in different sectors and subunits in the mining industry and to identify associated occupations, in an attempt to locate gaps between hearing conservation efforts and hearing loss risks.Design: Descriptive statistics and frequency tables were generated by commodity types, subunit operations, and/or occupations. Temporal trends of the incidences of hearing loss were reported by commodity types.Study Sample: The MSHA Accident/Injury/Illness and MSHA Address/Employment databases from 2000 to 2014 were used.Results: Incidence rate of OHL was reported highest in the coal sector compared to other commodity types. Those members of the workforce that entered the mining industry after the year 2000 accounted for 6.5% and 19.0% of the total hearing loss records for coal and non-coal, respectively. High-risk occupations found in all three commodity sectors (coal; stone, sand, and gravel; and metal/non-metal) were electrician/helper/wireman, mechanic/repairman/helper, bulldozer/tractor operator, and truck driver.Conclusion: Hearing loss risks were not uniform across mining sectors, subunit operations, and occupations. In addition to the continuous efforts of implementing engineering controls to reduce machinery sound level exposure for operators, a multi-level approach may benefit those occupations with a more dynamic exposure profile - e.g., labour/utilityman/bullgang, electrician/helper/wireman, and mechanic/repairman/helper.

Keywords: Noise-induced hearing loss; hearing conservation; hearing loss prevention; mining industry; noise.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Temporal trend of hearing loss IR by commodity type, 2000–2014.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Azman AS, Alcorn L, and Li M. 2015. “Laboratory evaluations of a 25-mm drill bit isolator to reduce noise from roof bolting machines in underground coal mines” in INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, 3432–3441. San Francisco, CA: Institute of Noise Control Engineering.
    1. Azman A, Camargo H, and Alcorn L. 2014. “Laboratory evaluations of a redesigned collapsible drill steel enclosure to reduce noise from roof bolting machines” in INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, 539–547. Fort Lauderdale, Florida: Institute of Noise Control Engineering.
    1. Bartholomae RC, and Redmond GW 1986. ‘Noise-Induced Hearing Loss-A Review.’ Annals of the American Conference of Government Industrial Hygienists. 14.
    1. Bauer ER, and Kohler JL 2000. “Cross-Sectional Survey of Noise Exposure in the Mining Industry”. In Proc 31st Annual Institute of Mining Health, Safety and Research, Roanoke, edited by Bockosh GR, Karmis M, Langton J, McCarter MK, and Rowe B, 17–30. Blacksburg, VA: Virgina Tech. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/works/coversheet1025.html.
    1. Bauer ER, Babich DR, and Vipperman JR 2006. “Equipment Noise and Worker Exposure in the Coal Mining Industry.” NIOSH Information Circular IC 9492: 1–77.

LinkOut - more resources