Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 1;179(9):1201-1208.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.1678.

Financial Implications of 12-Month Dispensing of Oral Contraceptive Pills in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System

Affiliations

Financial Implications of 12-Month Dispensing of Oral Contraceptive Pills in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System

Colleen P Judge-Golden et al. JAMA Intern Med. .

Erratum in

  • Correction to Number in Abstract.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Sep 1;179(9):1303. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.3746. JAMA Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 31380889 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: The Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system is the largest integrated health care system in the United States. Like most US health plans, the VA currently stipulates a 3-month maximum dispensing limit for all medications, including oral contraceptive pills (OCPs). However, 12-month OCP dispensing has been shown to improve continuation of use, decrease coverage gaps, and reduce unintended pregnancy in other practice settings.

Objective: To estimate the financial and reproductive health implications for the VA of implementing a 12-month OCP dispensing option, with the goal of informing policy change.

Design, setting, and participants: A decision model from the VA payer perspective was developed to estimate incremental costs to the health care system of allowing the option to receive a 12-month supply of OCPs up front, compared with the standard 3-month maximum, during a 1-year time horizon. A model cohort of 24 309 reproductive-aged, heterosexually active, female VA enrollees who wish to avoid pregnancy for at least 1 year was assumed. Probabilities of continuation of OCP use, coverage gaps, pregnancy, and pregnancy outcomes were drawn from published data. Costs of OCP provision and pregnancy-related care and the number of women using OCPs were drawn from VA administrative data. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess model robustness.

Main outcomes and measures: Incremental per-woman and total costs to the VA of allowing for 12-month dispensing of OCPs compared with standard 3-month dispensing.

Results: The 12-month OCP dispensing option, modeled from the VA health system perspective using a cohort of 24 309 women, resulted in anticipated VA annual cost savings of $87.12 per woman compared with the cost of 3-month dispensing, or an estimated total savings of $2 117 800 annually. Cost savings resulted from an absolute reduction of 24 unintended pregnancies per 1000 women per year with 12-month dispensing, or 583 unintended pregnancies averted annually. Expected cost savings with 12-month dispensing were sensitive to changes in the probability of OCP coverage gaps with 3-month dispensing, the probability of pregnancy during coverage gaps, and the proportion of pregnancies paid for by the VA. When simultaneously varying all variables across plausible ranges, the 12-month strategy was cost saving in 95.4% of model iterations.

Conclusions and relevance: Adoption of a 12-month OCP dispensing option is expected to produce substantial cost savings for the VA while better supporting reproductive autonomy and reducing unintended pregnancy among women veterans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Ms Judge-Golden reported receiving grant TL1 TR001858 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCAT) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (principal investigator, Wishwa Kapoor, MD, MPH) during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Decision Model Schematic
Decision analysis model of 3- vs 12-month dispensing strategies for oral contraceptive pills (OCPs). Rx indicates prescription.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. One-way Sensitivity Analyses
Bar colors denote the directionality of the variable range associated with the resultant incremental cost (ie, dark blue bars represent decreasing and light blue bars indicate increasing values). Threshold values are reported in Table 2. OCP indicates oral contraceptive pill; p, probability; VA, Veterans Affairs. aVariation can result in the 3-month strategy being favored over the 12-month option.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kizer KW, Dudley RA. Extreme makeover: transformation of the veterans health care system. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:313-339. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090940 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frayne S, Phibbs C, Saechao F, et al. . Sociodemographics, Utilization, Costs of Care, and Health Profile. Washington, DC: Women’s Health Evaluation Initiative, Women’s Health Services, Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs; 2014. Sourcebook: Women Veterans in the Veterans Health Administration, Volume 3.
    1. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration. VHA DIRECTIVE 1330.01(1). https://www.va.gov/vhapublications/ViewPublication.asp?pub_ID=5332. Amended July 24, 2018. Accessed Sept 29, 2017.
    1. Borrero S, Callegari LS, Zhao X, et al. . Unintended pregnancy and contraceptive use among women veterans: the ECUUN study. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32(8):900-908. doi:10.1007/s11606-017-4049-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Curtis KM, Jatlaoui TC, Tepper NK, et al. . US selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016;65(4):1-66. doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr6504a1 - DOI - PubMed