Safety screening in early drug discovery: An optimized assay panel

J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2019 Sep-Oct:99:106609. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2019.106609. Epub 2019 Jul 5.

Abstract

Background: Several factors contribute to the development failure of novel pharmaceuticals, one of the most important being adverse effects in pre-clinical and clinical studies. Early identification of off-target compound activity can reduce safety-related attrition in development. In vitro profiling of drug candidates against a broad range of targets is an important part of the compound selection process. Many compounds are synthesized during early drug discovery, making it necessary to assess poly-pharmacology at a limited number of targets. This paper describes how a rational, statistical-ranking approach was used to generate a cost-effective, optimized panel of assays that allows selectivity focused structure-activity relationships to be explored for many molecules. This panel of 50 targets has been used to routinely screen Roche small molecules generated across a diverse range of therapeutic targets. Target hit rates from the Bioprint® database and internal Roche compounds are discussed. We further describe an example of how this panel was used within an anti-infective project to reduce in vivo testing.

Method: To select the optimized panel of targets, IC50 values of compounds in the BioPrint® database were used to identify assay "hits" i.e. IC50 ≤ 1 μM in 123 different in vitro pharmacological assays. If groups of compounds hit the same targets, the target with the higher hit rate was selected, while others were considered redundant. Using a step-wise analysis, an assay panel was identified to maximize diversity and minimize redundancy. Over a five-year period, this panel of 50 off-targets was used to screen ≈1200 compounds synthesized for Roche drug discovery programs. Compounds were initially tested at 10 μM and hit rates generated are reported. Within one project, the number of hits was used to refine the choice of compounds being assessed in vivo.

Results: 95% of compounds from the BioPrint® panel were identified within the top 47-ranked assays. Based on this analytical approach and the addition of three targets with established safety concerns, a Roche panel was created for external screening. hERG is screened internally and not included in this analysis. Screening at 10 μM in the Roche panel identified that adenosine A3 and 5HT2B receptors had the highest hit rates (~30%), with 50% of the targets having a hit rate of ≤4%. An anti-infective program identified that a high number of hits in the Roche panel was associated with mortality in 19 mouse tolerability studies. To reduce the severity and number of such studies, future compound selections integrated the panel hit score into the selection process for in vivo studies. It was identified that compounds which hit less targets in the panel and had free plasma exposures of ~2 μM were generally better tolerated.

Discussion: This paper describes how an optimized panel of 50 assays was selected on the basis of hit similarity at 123 targets. This reduced panel, provides a cost-effective screening panel for assessing compound promiscuity, whilst also including many safety-relevant targets. Frequent use of the panel in early drug discovery has provided promiscuity and safety-relevant information to inform pre-clinical drug development at Roche.