Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 4;9(9):2913-2924.
doi: 10.1534/g3.119.400493.

Deep Kernel for Genomic and Near Infrared Predictions in Multi-environment Breeding Trials

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Deep Kernel for Genomic and Near Infrared Predictions in Multi-environment Breeding Trials

Jaime Cuevas et al. G3 (Bethesda). .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Kernel methods are flexible and easy to interpret and have been successfully used in genomic-enabled prediction of various plant species. Kernel methods used in genomic prediction comprise the linear genomic best linear unbiased predictor (GBLUP or GB) kernel, and the Gaussian kernel (GK). In general, these kernels have been used with two statistical models: single-environment and genomic × environment (GE) models. Recently near infrared spectroscopy (NIR) has been used as an inexpensive and non-destructive high-throughput phenotyping method for predicting unobserved line performance in plant breeding trials. In this study, we used a non-linear arc-cosine kernel (AK) that emulates deep learning artificial neural networks. We compared AK prediction accuracy with the prediction accuracy of GB and GK kernel methods in four genomic data sets, one of which also includes pedigree and NIR information. Results show that for all four data sets, AK and GK kernels achieved higher prediction accuracy than the linear GB kernel for the single-environment and GE multi-environment models. In addition, AK achieved similar or slightly higher prediction accuracy than the GK kernel. For all data sets, the GE model achieved higher prediction accuracy than the single-environment model. For the data set that includes pedigree, markers and NIR, results show that the NIR wavelength alone achieved lower prediction accuracy than the genomic information alone; however, the pedigree plus NIR information achieved only slightly lower prediction accuracy than the marker plus the NIR high-throughput data.

Keywords: GenPred; Genomic Best Unbiased Predictor (GBLUP, GB linear and non-linear kernel methods); Genomic Prediction; Genomic based prediction; Shared Data Resources; deep learning; genomic × environment interaction model; near infrared (NIR) high-throughput phenotype; single-environment model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
WHEAT1 data set. Marginal likelihood for several levels (layers) for environments.
Figure 2
Figure 2
WHEAT4 data set. All spectra for wheat lines are depicted in the three figures; light colors are for each wheat line, while the strong color line in each graph is the average of all spectra. (a) absorbance raw data (red); (b) normalized absorbance (first derivative) (blue); (c) normalized second derivative (green).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akdemir D., and Jannink J.-L., 2015. Locally epistatic genomic relationship matrices for genomic association and prediction. Genetics 199: 857–871. 10.1534/genetics.114.173658 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Browning B. L., and Browning S. R., 2009. A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 84: 210–223. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.01.005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burgueño J., de Los Campos G., Weigel K., and Crossa J., 2012. Genomic prediction of breeding values when modeling genotype × environment interaction using pedigree and dense molecular markers. Crop Sci. 52: 707–719. 10.2135/cropsci2011.06.0299 - DOI
    1. Cho Y., and Saul L. K., 2009. Kernel Methods for Deep Learning. NIPS’09 Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 342–350.
    1. Crossa J., Burgueño J., Dreisigacker S., Vargas M., Herrera-Foessel S. A. et al. , 2007. Association analysis of historical bread wheat germplasm using additive genetic covariance of relatives and population structure. Genetics 177: 1889–1913. doi. ISSN: 0016–6731. 10.1534/genetics.107.078659 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources