Us, Too. Sexual Harassment Within Academic Medicine in the United States

Am J Med. 2020 Feb;133(2):245-248. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.06.031. Epub 2019 Jul 11.

Abstract

Purpose: We report on the extent of sexual harassment among residents and examine its relationship to specialty and program year and effects.

Methods: Using the C-Change Resident Survey, we surveyed residents in 34 internal medicine, pediatrics, and general surgery programs in 14 academic medical centers (AMCs). A total of 1708 residents completed the survey (70% response-rate); 51% (n = 879) were women. Respondents reported unwanted sexual comments, attention, or advances by a superior or colleagues within the last 2 years. Measures of vitality and ethical or moral distress were included in the surveys.

Results: Rates of sexual harassment reported by women differed across the 34 programs, with an interquartile range of 0%-11%. Residents in pediatrics had the lowest frequencies of sexual harassment (mean 2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0%, 4%). Residents in internal medicine had higher rates of sexual harassment (mean 7%, 95% CI 1%, 25%). Residents in surgery had the highest rates (mean 12%, 95% CI 2%, 33%). Sexual harassment was associated with lower levels of vitality and higher ethical or moral distress (both, P <0.05).

Conclusions: Sexual harassment is more common for women residents in Internal Medicine and Surgery programs. The adverse effects of sexual harassment on female residents detracts from an institution's professional workforce.

Keywords: Culture of medicine; Residents; Sexual harassment.

MeSH terms

  • Data Collection
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Internship and Residency / statistics & numerical data*
  • Sexual Harassment*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • United States