Emerging technology allows patients to measure and record their heart rate (HR) remotely by photoplethysmography (PPG) using smart devices like smartphones. However, the validity and expected distribution of such measurements are unclear, making it difficult for physicians to help patients interpret real-world, remote and on-demand HR measurements. Our goal was to validate HR-PPG, measured using a smartphone app, against HR-electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements and describe out-of-clinic, real-world, HR-PPG values according to age, demographics, body mass index, physical activity level, and disease. To validate the measurements, we obtained simultaneous HR-PPG and HR-ECG in 50 consecutive patients at our cardiology clinic. We then used data from participants enrolled in the Health eHeart cohort between 1 April 2014 and 30 April 2018 to derive real-world norms of HR-PPG according to demographics and medical conditions. HR-PPG and HR-ECG were highly correlated (Intraclass correlation = 0.90). A total of 66,788 Health eHeart Study participants contributed 3,144,332 HR-PPG measurements. The mean real-world HR was 79.1 bpm ± 14.5. The 95th percentile of real-world HR was ≤110 in individuals aged 18-45, ≤100 in those aged 45-60 and ≤95 bpm in individuals older than 60 years old. In multivariable linear regression, the number of medical conditions, female gender, increasing body mass index, and being Hispanic was associated with an increased HR, whereas increasing age was associated with a reduced HR. Our study provides the largest real-world norms for remotely obtained, real-world HR according to various strata and they may help physicians interpret and engage with patients presenting such data.
Keywords: Epidemiology; Predictive markers.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interestsG.M. has received research funding from Medtronic and Cardiogram Inc, is a consultant for Lifewatch and InCarda, and holds equity in InCarda. P.K. is an employee of Azumio. There are no disclosures for the remaining authors. Azumio provided no financial support for this study and only provided access to the heart rate data. Data analysis and interpretation was performed independently from Azumio.
Resting and Postexercise Heart Rate Detection From Fingertip and Facial Photoplethysmography Using a Smartphone Camera: A Validation Study.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Mar 13;5(3):e33. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7275. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017. PMID: 28288955 Free PMC article.
Heart rate variability (HRV) in deep breathing tests and 5-min short-term recordings: agreement of ear photoplethysmography with ECG measurements, in 343 subjects.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Aug;116(8):1527-35. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3401-3. Epub 2016 Jun 8. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016. PMID: 27278521
Clinical Validation of Heart Rate Apps: Mixed-Methods Evaluation Study.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Aug 25;5(8):e129. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7254. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017. PMID: 28842392 Free PMC article.
The use of photoplethysmography for assessing hypertension.NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Jun 26;2:60. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0136-7. eCollection 2019. NPJ Digit Med. 2019. PMID: 31388564 Free PMC article. Review.
Smartphone-based Arrhythmia Detection: Should we encourage patients to use the ECG in their pocket?J Atr Fibrillation. 2017 Apr 30;9(6):1605. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1605. eCollection 2017 Apr-May. J Atr Fibrillation. 2017. PMID: 29250298 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by 1 article
Mobile Health Technologies in Cardiopulmonary Disease.Chest. 2020 Mar;157(3):654-664. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.10.015. Epub 2019 Oct 31. Chest. 2020. PMID: 31678305 Review.