Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 15;13(7):e0007565.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007565. eCollection 2019 Jul.

High-resolution contact networks of free-ranging domestic dogs Canis familiaris and implications for transmission of infection

Affiliations
Free PMC article

High-resolution contact networks of free-ranging domestic dogs Canis familiaris and implications for transmission of infection

Jared K Wilson-Aggarwal et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Contact patterns strongly influence the dynamics of disease transmission in both human and non-human animal populations. Domestic dogs Canis familiaris are a social species and are a reservoir for several zoonotic infections, yet few studies have empirically determined contact patterns within dog populations. Using high-resolution proximity logging technology, we characterised the contact networks of free-ranging domestic dogs from two settlements (n = 108 dogs, covering >80% of the population in each settlement) in rural Chad. We used these data to simulate the transmission of an infection comparable to rabies and investigated the effects of including observed contact heterogeneities on epidemic outcomes. We found that dog contact networks displayed considerable heterogeneity, particularly in the duration of contacts and that the network had communities that were highly correlated with household membership. Simulations using observed contact networks had smaller epidemic sizes than those that assumed random mixing, demonstrating the unsuitability of homogenous mixing models in predicting epidemic outcomes. When contact heterogeneities were included in simulations, the network position of the individual initially infected had an important effect on epidemic outcomes. The risk of an epidemic occurring was best predicted by the initially infected individual's ranked degree, while epidemic size was best predicted by the individual's ranked eigenvector centrality. For dogs in one settlement, we found that ranked eigenvector centrality was correlated with range size. Our results demonstrate that observed heterogeneities in contacts are important for the prediction of epidemiological outcomes in free-ranging domestic dogs. We show that individuals presenting a higher risk for disease transmission can be identified by their network position and provide evidence that observable traits hold potential for informing targeted disease management strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Locations of two settlements in rural Chad at which contact patterns of free-ranging domestic dogs were quantified.
Pentagons represent a household where at least one dog was collared. Villages include Magrao (purple), Sawata (pink), Kakale-Mberi (green) and Awine (orange). The satellite image was generated using the Esri world imagery basemap (sources: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA FSA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community).
Fig 2
Fig 2. The contact networks, degree distribution, edge weight distribution and probability density distribution of contacts between free-ranging dogs for two settlements in Chad.
In the networks, the circles represent individuals and the colours indicate the village that the dogs belong to: Kakale-Mberi in green, Awine in orange, Magrao in purple and Sawata in pink. The lines connecting individuals indicate that they have been in contact and the thickness of the lines are proportional to the logged daily average contact time between individuals. The red line of the degree distributions (probability that a randomly chosen node has degree ≥ k) indicates the mean degree (number of connections).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Simulated epidemic sizes of disease transmission through empirically determined contact networks for free-ranging dogs in two rural settlements in Chad.
Bean plots show the distribution of epidemic sizes of simulations using the observed binomial and weighted networks and random networks: Kakale (n = 4800) and Magrao (n = 6000). All plots consider simulations where an epidemic occurred (the disease spread to at least one individual). The percentage of simulations that resulted in an epidemic is displayed above each bean plot. The horizontal red lines indicate mean epidemic size.
Fig 4
Fig 4. The relationship between epidemic outcomes simulated on contact networks of free-ranging dogs from two rural settlements in Chad and the seeded individual’s ranked network position.
Scatter plots for each settlement (Kakale and Magrao) show the seeded individual’s ranked centrality measures (Eigenvector centrality (second order contacts), degree (total number of contacts) and betweenness (contribution to number of shortest paths)) plotted against the proportion of simulations that resulted in an epidemic (the disease was transmitted to at least one individual) and mean epidemic size. The mean epidemic sizes exclude simulations where the infection did not spread beyond the seeded individual. The data include the results for the random, binomial and weighted networks, and are for simulations when R0 was set to 2.4. GAMs are fitted to the data to identify non-linear trends.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. May RM. Network structure and the biology of populations. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006; 21:394–9. 10.1016/j.tree.2006.03.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Craft ME. Infectious disease transmission and contact networks in wildlife and livestock. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B. 2015; 370:1–12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weber N, Carter SP, Dall SRX, Delahay RJ, McDonald JL, Bearhop S, et al. Badger social networks correlate with tuberculosis infection. Curr Biol. 2013; 23:915–6. - PubMed
    1. Drewe JA. Who infects whom? Social networks and tuberculosis transmission in wild meerkats. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2009; 277:633–42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. MacIntosh AJJ, Jacobs A, Garcia C, Shimizu K, Mouri K, Huffman MA, et al. Monkeys in the Middle: Parasite Transmission through the Social Network of a Wild Primate. PLoS One. 2012; 7:15–21. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

JW-A is funded by a studentship from the GW4+ Doctoral Training Partnership, funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (https://nerc.ukri.org). RM is funded by The Carter Center (https://www.cartercenter.org). Fieldwork was undertaken in parallel with a project on Guinea worm epidemiology in dogs funded by a grant from The Carter Center and facilitated by the World Health Organisation (http://www.who.int). LO, MT and CC acknowledge support from the Lagrange Project of the ISI Foundation (https://www.isi.it) funded by the CRT Foundation (http://www.fondazionecrt.it/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.