Assessing the safety of electronic health records: a national longitudinal study of medication-related decision support
- PMID: 31320497
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009609
Assessing the safety of electronic health records: a national longitudinal study of medication-related decision support
Abstract
Background: Electronic health records (EHR) can improve safety via computerised physician order entry with clinical decision support, designed in part to alert providers and prevent potential adverse drug events at entry and before they reach the patient. However, early evidence suggested performance at preventing adverse drug events was mixed.
Methods: We used data from a national, longitudinal sample of 1527 hospitals in the USA from 2009 to 2016 who took a safety performance assessment test using simulated medication orders to test how well their EHR prevented medication errors with potential for patient harm. We calculated the descriptive statistics on performance on the assessment over time, by years of hospital experience with the test and across hospital characteristics. Finally, we used ordinary least squares regression to identify hospital characteristics associated with higher test performance.
Results: The average hospital EHR system correctly prevented only 54.0% of potential adverse drug events tested on the 44-order safety performance assessment in 2009; this rose to 61.6% in 2016. Hospitals that took the assessment multiple times performed better in subsequent years than those taking the test the first time, from 55.2% in the first year of test experience to 70.3% in the eighth, suggesting efforts to participate in voluntary self-assessment and improvement may be helpful in improving medication safety performance.
Conclusion: Hospital medication order safety performance has improved over time but is far from perfect. The specifics of EHR medication safety implementation and improvement play a key role in realising the benefits of computerising prescribing, as organisations have substantial latitude in terms of what they implement. Intentional quality improvement efforts appear to be a critical part of high safety performance and may indicate the importance of a culture of safety.
Keywords: decision support, computerised; hospital medicine; information technology; medication safety; patient safety.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: DB reported consulting for EarlySense, which makes patient safety monitoring systems; receiving cash compensation from CDI (Negev), which is a not-for-profit incubator for health internet technology start-ups; receiving equity from Valera Health, which makes software to help patients with chronic diseases; CLEW, which makes software to support clinical decision-making in intensive care; and MDClone, which takes clinical data and produces deidentified versions of it. DC is an employee of Pascal Metrics, a federally certified patient safety organisation.
Similar articles
-
National Trends in the Safety Performance of Electronic Health Record Systems From 2009 to 2018.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e205547. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5547. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 32469412 Free PMC article.
-
Safe use of electronic health records and health information technology systems: trust but verify.J Patient Saf. 2013 Dec;9(4):177-89. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182a8c2b2. J Patient Saf. 2013. PMID: 24257062
-
National trends in safety performance of electronic health record systems in children's hospitals.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 1;24(2):268-274. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw134. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017. PMID: 27638908 Free PMC article.
-
Computerised prescribing for safer medication ordering: still a work in progress.BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 May;25(5):315-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004677. Epub 2015 Oct 29. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016. PMID: 26515444 Review. No abstract available.
-
Hospital systems for the detection and prevention of adverse drug events.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Jun;89(6):779-81. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2010.356. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011. PMID: 21593752 Review.
Cited by
-
Electronic Health Record Usability, Satisfaction, and Burnout for Family Physicians.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2426956. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.26956. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 39207759 Free PMC article.
-
How Safe are Outpatient Electronic Health Records? An Evaluation of Medication-Related Decision Support using the Ambulatory Electronic Health Record Evaluation Tool.Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Oct;14(5):981-991. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1777107. Epub 2023 Dec 13. Appl Clin Inform. 2023. PMID: 38092360
-
Effectiveness of non-interruptive nudge interventions in electronic health records to improve the delivery of care in hospitals: a systematic review.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Jun 20;30(7):1313-1322. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad083. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023. PMID: 37187160 Free PMC article.
-
Validating ICD-10 codes for adverse drug events in hospitalised older adults: protocol for a cross-sectional study.BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 2;12(11):e062853. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062853. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36323472 Free PMC article.
-
Electronic Medication Management Systems: Analysis of Enhancements to Reduce Errors and Improve Workflow.Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Oct;12(5):1049-1060. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1739196. Epub 2021 Nov 10. Appl Clin Inform. 2021. PMID: 34758493 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical