Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;57(9):695-701.
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001169.

Changes in Hospital Referral Patterns to Skilled Nursing Facilities Under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

Affiliations

Changes in Hospital Referral Patterns to Skilled Nursing Facilities Under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

K Lucy Kim et al. Med Care. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) penalizes hospitals for higher-than-expected readmission rates. Almost 20% of Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) patients receive postacute care in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) after hospitalization. SNF patients have high readmission rates.

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the association between changes in hospital referral patterns to SNFs and HRRP penalty pressure.

Design: We examined changes in the relationship between penalty pressure and outcomes before versus after HRRP announcement among 2698 hospitals serving 6,936,393 Medicare FFS patients admitted for target conditions: acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, or pneumonia. Hospital-level penalty pressure was the expected penalty rate in the first year of the HRRP multiplied by Medicare discharge share.

Outcomes: Informal integration measured by the percentage of referrals to hospitals' most referred SNF; formal integration measured by SNF acquisition; readmission-based quality index of the SNFs to which a hospital referred discharged patients; referral rate to any SNF.

Results: Hospitals facing the median level of penalty pressure had modest differential increases of 0.3 percentage points in the proportion of referrals to the most referred SNF and a 0.006 SD increase in the average quality index of SNFs referred to. There were no statistically significant differential increases in formal acquisition of SNFs or referral rate to SNF.

Conclusions: HRRP did not prompt substantial changes in hospital referral patterns to SNFs, although readmissions for patients referred to SNF differentially decreased more than for other patients, warranting investigation of other mechanisms underlying readmissions reduction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures:

Drs. Li and Horwitz and Ms. Kuang have performed work under contract to CMS to develop quality measures for readmissions. Drs. Kim and Desai have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Trends in outcomes among hospitals with penalty pressure in top versus bottom quartiles
Sample mean outcomes at the hospital-year level among hospitals in top versus bottom quartiles of penalty pressure are plotted over the study period. Penalty pressure is the expected penalty rate in the first year of HRRP multiplied by the share of Medicare discharges in 2010. The vertical lines dividing each panel distinguish between the pre-and post-HRRP periods.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zuckerman RB, Sheingold SH, Orav EJ, Ruhter J, Epstein AM. Readmissions, observation, and the hospital readmissions reduction program. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(16):1543–1551. - PubMed
    1. Desai NR, Ross JS, Kwon JY, et al. Association between hospital penalty status under the hospital readmission reduction program and readmission rates for target and nontarget conditions. Jama. 2016;316(24):2647–2656. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gupta A Impacts of Performance Pay for Hospitals: The Readmissions Reduction Program.; 2017. http://www.web.stanford.edu/~atulg/Gupta_JMP.pdf.
    1. Chen M, Grabowski DC. Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program: Intended and Unintended Effects. Med Care Res Rev. 2017:1077558717744611. - PubMed
    1. Ziedan E The Intended and Unintended Consequences of the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program. 2017.

Publication types

MeSH terms