Delirium detection in older acute medical inpatients: a multicentre prospective comparative diagnostic test accuracy study of the 4AT and the confusion assessment method
- PMID: 31337404
- PMCID: PMC6651960
- DOI: 10.1186/s12916-019-1367-9
Delirium detection in older acute medical inpatients: a multicentre prospective comparative diagnostic test accuracy study of the 4AT and the confusion assessment method
Abstract
Background: Delirium affects > 15% of hospitalised patients but is grossly underdetected, contributing to poor care. The 4 'A's Test (4AT, www.the4AT.com ) is a short delirium assessment tool designed for routine use without special training. The primary objective was to assess the accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection. The secondary objective was to compare the 4AT with another commonly used delirium assessment tool, the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM).
Methods: This was a prospective diagnostic test accuracy study set in emergency departments or acute medical wards involving acute medical patients aged ≥ 70. All those without acutely life-threatening illness or coma were eligible. Patients underwent (1) reference standard delirium assessment based on DSM-IV criteria and (2) were randomised to either the index test (4AT, scores 0-12; prespecified score of > 3 considered positive) or the comparator (CAM; scored positive or negative), in a random order, using computer-generated pseudo-random numbers, stratified by study site, with block allocation. Reference standard and 4AT or CAM assessments were performed by pairs of independent raters blinded to the results of the other assessment.
Results: Eight hundred forty-three individuals were randomised: 21 withdrew, 3 lost contact, 32 indeterminate diagnosis, 2 missing outcome, and 785 were included in the analysis. Mean age was 81.4 (SD 6.4) years. 12.1% (95/785) had delirium by reference standard assessment, 14.3% (56/392) by 4AT, and 4.7% (18/384) by CAM. The 4AT had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90 (95% CI 0.84-0.96). The 4AT had a sensitivity of 76% (95% CI 61-87%) and a specificity of 94% (95% CI 92-97%). The CAM had a sensitivity of 40% (95% CI 26-57%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI 98-100%).
Conclusions: The 4AT is a short, pragmatic tool which can help improving detection rates of delirium in routine clinical care.
Trial registration: International standard randomised controlled trial number (ISRCTN) 53388093 . Date applied 30/05/2014; date assigned 02/06/2014.
Keywords: 4AT; Confusion assessment method (CAM); Delirium; Diagnostic test accuracy; Hospital; Sensitivity; Specificity.
Conflict of interest statement
AMJM led the design of the 4AT in 2011 (with others, see
Figures
Similar articles
-
The 4 'A's test for detecting delirium in acute medical patients: a diagnostic accuracy study.Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(40):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta23400. Health Technol Assess. 2019. PMID: 31397263 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Protocol for validation of the 4AT, a rapid screening tool for delirium: a multicentre prospective diagnostic test accuracy study.BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 10;8(2):e015572. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015572. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 29440152 Free PMC article.
-
The 4AT, a rapid delirium detection tool for use in hospice inpatient units: Findings from a validation study.Palliat Med. 2024 May;38(5):535-545. doi: 10.1177/02692163241242648. Palliat Med. 2024. PMID: 38767241 Free PMC article.
-
Delirium assessment tools among hospitalized older adults: A systematic review and metaanalysis of diagnostic accuracy.Ageing Res Rev. 2023 Sep;90:102025. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2023.102025. Epub 2023 Jul 30. Ageing Res Rev. 2023. PMID: 37527704 Review.
-
The confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) and intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC) for the diagnosis of delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies.Crit Care. 2012 Jul 3;16(4):R115. doi: 10.1186/cc11407. Crit Care. 2012. PMID: 22759376 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Delirium in nursing home residents: is there a role of antidepressants? A cross sectional study.BMC Geriatr. 2024 Sep 17;24(1):767. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05360-z. BMC Geriatr. 2024. PMID: 39289644 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Recognizing Acute Delirium as Part of Your Routine (RADAR) Scale for Delirium Assessment in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jun 28;12(13):1294. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12131294. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38998829 Free PMC article.
-
Extracellular Vesicle MicroRNAs as Predictive Biomarkers in Postoperative Delirium After Spine Surgery: Preliminary Study.J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024 Nov 1;79(11):glae162. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glae162. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 38970345
-
The interrelationship between multiple long-term conditions (MLTC) and delirium: a scoping review.Age Ageing. 2024 Jul 2;53(7):afae120. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae120. Age Ageing. 2024. PMID: 38965032 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The 4AT scale for rapid detection of delirium in emergency department triage.Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 May 14;11:1345983. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1345983. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 38808143 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Reynish EL, Hapca SM, De Souza N, Cvoro V, Donnan PT, Guthrie B. Epidemiology and outcomes of people with dementia, delirium, and unspecified cognitive impairment in the general hospital: prospective cohort study of 10,014 admissions. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0899-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Pendlebury ST, Lovett NG, Smith SC, Dutta N, Bendon C, Lloyd-Lavery A, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM. Observational, longitudinal study of delirium in consecutive unselected acute medical admissions: age-specific rates and associated factors, mortality and re-admission. BMJ open. 2015;5(11):e007808. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007808. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
