Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Aug;125(8):503-515.
doi: 10.1111/eth.12882. Epub 2019 May 10.

Evolution and function of multimodal courtship displays

Affiliations
Review

Evolution and function of multimodal courtship displays

Clémentine Mitoyen et al. Ethology. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Courtship displays are behaviours aimed to facilitate attraction and mating with the opposite sex and are very common across the animal kingdom. Most courtship displays are multimodal, meaning that they are composed of concomitant signals occurring in different sensory modalities. Although courtship often strongly influences reproductive success, the question of why and how males use multimodal courtship to increase their fitness has not yet received much attention. Very little is known about the role of different components of male courtship and their relative importance for females. Indeed, most of the work on courtship displays have focused on effects on female choice, often neglecting other possible roles. Additionally, a number of scientists have recently stressed the importance of considering the complexity of a display and the interactions between its different components in order to grasp all the information contained in those multimodal signals. Unfortunately, these methods have not yet been extensively adapted in courtship studies. The aim of this study was to review what is currently known about the functional significance of courtship displays, particularly about the role of multimodality in the courtship communication context. Emphasis is placed on those cases where a complete picture of the communication system can only be assessed by taking complexity and interaction between different modalities into account.

Keywords: elaborate displays; female preference; multisensory signals; sexual behaviour; sexual stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Multidimensional plots of female responses to multicomponent male courtship. Components A and B have different effects on female preference and female sexual stimulation, resulting in two three‐dimensional planes. (a) No interaction between components A and B. As component A increases, female sexual stimulation increases, but not female preference. Conversely, component B has a positive effect on female preference but does not influence female sexual stimulation. (b) An interaction exists between courtship components A and B. The effect of component A on female sexual stimulation increases as the magnitude of B increases. Component B alone does not have any effect on female sexual stimulation. [Based on Hebets et al. (2016) and Smith and Evans (2013)] [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alexander, R. D. (1961). Aggressiveness, territoriality, and sexual behavior in field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Behaviour, 17, 130–223. 10.1163/156853961X00042 - DOI
    1. Amy, M. , Salvin, P. , Naguib, M. , & Leboucher, G. (2015). Female signalling to male song in the domestic canary, Serinus canaria . Royal Society Open Science, 2, 140196–140196. 10.1098/rsos.140196 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ancel, A. , Gilbert, C. , & Beaulieu, M. (2013). The long engagement of the emperor penguin. Polar Biology, 36, 573–577. 10.1007/s00300-013-1285-9s - DOI
    1. Andersson, M. B. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    1. Backwell, P. R. Y. , & Passmore, N. I. (1996). Time constraints and multiple choice criteria in the sampling behaviour and mate choice of the fiddler crab, Uca annulipes . Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 38, 407–416. 10.1007/s002650050258 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources