Cochlear implants before 9 months of age led to more natural spoken language development without increased surgical risks
- PMID: 31350923
- DOI: 10.1111/apa.14954
Cochlear implants before 9 months of age led to more natural spoken language development without increased surgical risks
Abstract
Aim: Evidence suggests that cochlear implants are beneficial for language development, but there is no consensus about the ideal age for surgery. We investigated how language development and surgical safety were affected by patients' ages.
Methods: This study comprised 103 children (52 boys) aged 4.3-16 years who received cochlear implants at 5-29 months at the Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, between 2002 and 2013. All showed typical development and were from monolingual homes. Bilateral implants were common (95%). The children were regularly assessed on language understanding, vocabulary and speech recognition by a multi-disciplinary team for 10.0 ± 3.7 (4.7-16.0) years.
Results: There were no associations between complications after surgery and the age when children had their first implant. Children implanted at 5-11 months reached an age-equivalent level of language understanding and better vocabulary outcome sooner than subgroups implanted later. Children who had surgery at 12-29 months demonstrated more atypical and delayed language abilities over time. Early implantation, preferably before 9 months, may lead to a more typical trajectory of spoken language development.
Conclusion: Our findings showed that cochlear implantation before 9 months was safe. Early implantation may reduce the negative effects of auditory deprivation and promotes more natural and synchronised language development.
Keywords: cochlear implantation; hearing impairment; language development; paediatric implantation; surgical safety.
© 2019 The Authors. Acta Paediatrica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation Acta Paediatrica.
Similar articles
-
Communication development in children who receive a cochlear implant by 12 months of age.Otol Neurotol. 2013 Apr;34(3):443-50. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182814d2c. Otol Neurotol. 2013. PMID: 23442570
-
Speech, vocabulary, and the education of children using cochlear implants: oral or total communication?J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000 Oct;43(5):1185-204. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4305.1185. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000. PMID: 11063240
-
Comparing the effect of auditory-only and auditory-visual modes in two groups of Persian children using cochlear implants: a randomized clinical trial.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Sep;77(9):1545-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.06.031. Epub 2013 Jul 27. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013. PMID: 23896386 Clinical Trial.
-
[Cochlear implantation in children].Ugeskr Laeger. 2018 Sep 17;180(38):V02180125. Ugeskr Laeger. 2018. PMID: 30259842 Review. Danish.
-
The Role of Statistical Learning in Understanding and Treating Spoken Language Outcomes in Deaf Children With Cochlear Implants.Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018 Aug 14;49(3S):723-739. doi: 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-STLT1-17-0138. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018. PMID: 30120449 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Children then, adults now: long-term outcomes-performance at 15, 20, and 25 years of cochlear implant use.Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Dec 14;4:1275808. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1275808. eCollection 2023. Front Rehabil Sci. 2023. PMID: 38170021 Free PMC article.
-
Time course from cochlear implant surgery to non-use for congenitally deaf recipients implanted as children over ten years ago.Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Dec 1;4:1283109. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1283109. eCollection 2023. Front Rehabil Sci. 2023. PMID: 38107197 Free PMC article.
-
Executive functions in preschool and school-age cochlear implant users: do they differ from their hearing peers? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Feb;281(2):579-600. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08260-x. Epub 2023 Oct 10. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 37816839 Review.
-
Verbal, Figural, and Arithmetic Fluency of Children with Cochlear Implants.Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Apr 22;13(5):349. doi: 10.3390/bs13050349. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37232588 Free PMC article.
-
Hearing and Cognition in Childhood.Laryngorhinootologie. 2023 May;102(S 01):S3-S11. doi: 10.1055/a-1973-5087. Epub 2023 May 2. Laryngorhinootologie. 2023. PMID: 37130527 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Kuhl PK. Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5(11):831-843.
-
- Kral A, Sharma A. Developmental neuroplasticity after cochlear implantation. Trends Neurosci. 2012;35(2):111-122.
-
- Pelucchi B, Hay JF, Saffran JR. Statistical learning in a natural language by 8-month-old infants. Child Dev. 2009;80(3):674-685.
-
- Ching T, Dillon H, Button L, et al. Age at intervention for permanent hearing loss and 5-year language outcomes. Pediatrics. 2017;140(3):e20164274.
-
- American Academy of Pediatrics JCoIH. Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics. 2007;120(4):898-921.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
