Institutional Variation in Quality of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Implantation: A Cohort Study
- PMID: 31357210
- DOI: 10.7326/M18-2810
Institutional Variation in Quality of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Implantation: A Cohort Study
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are associated with procedure-related complications, yet little is known about variation in complication rates among institutions that may suggest disparities in care quality.
Objective: To assess institutional variation in risk-standardized complication rates (RSCRs) for CIED.
Design: Cohort study.
Setting: 174 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand, 98 of which implanted at least 25 CIEDs during the study period.
Participants: 81 304 patients older than 18 years (mean, 74.7 years [SD, 12.4]; 37.9% female) who received a new CIED (65 711 permanent pacemakers [PPMs] and 15 593 implantable cardioverter-defibrillators [ICDs]) in 2010 to 2015.
Measurements: RSCRs and frequencies of major device-related complications during hospitalization or within 90 days of discharge.
Results: Of the cohort, 6664 patients (8.2%) had a major complication. Although complication rates were higher for ICDs than PPMs (10.04% vs. 7.76%), 76.5% of all complications were attributable to PPMs (5098 vs. 1566 for ICDs). Among hospitals that implanted at least 25 CIEDs, the median RSCR was 8.1%; however, rates varied from 5.3% to 14.3%, with 22 hospitals identified as having RSCRs that differed significantly from the national average. Similar variation was observed when RSCRs for PPM implantation (n = 96 hospitals) (median RSCR, 7.6% [range, 5.4% to 12.9%]) were considered separately from those for ICD placement (n = 68 hospitals) (median RSCR, 9.7% [range, 6.2% to 16.9%]) and persisted when only elective procedures were assessed (n = 88 hospitals) (median RSCR, 7.4% [range, 4.7% to 13.0%]).
Limitation: Possible unmeasured confounding from the use of administrative data.
Conclusion: CIED complications are common and vary among hospitals, suggesting institutional variation in CIED care quality. Concerted clinical and policy interventions are needed to address CIED-related complications. These efforts should preferentially target PPMs, because most CIED complications are attributable to these devices.
Primary funding source: The Hospitals Contribution Fund Research Foundation.
Comment in
-
Cardiac Device Implantation Complications: A Gap in the Quality of Care?Ann Intern Med. 2019 Sep 3;171(5):368-369. doi: 10.7326/M19-1895. Epub 2019 Jul 30. Ann Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 31357214 No abstract available.
-
Institutional Variation in Quality of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Implantation.Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jan 21;172(2):166. doi: 10.7326/L19-0708. Ann Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 31958832 No abstract available.
-
Institutional Variation in Quality of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Implantation.Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jan 21;172(2):166-167. doi: 10.7326/L19-0709. Ann Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 31958833 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
In-hospital complications after implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices: Analysis of a national inpatient database in Japan.J Cardiol. 2017 Nov;70(5):405-410. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Apr 20. J Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28434707
-
Device infections in implantable cardioverter defibrillators versus permanent pacemakers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Jul;30(7):1053-1065. doi: 10.1111/jce.13932. Epub 2019 Apr 17. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019. PMID: 30938929
-
Complications of cardiac implantable electronic device placement in public and private hospitals.Intern Med J. 2020 Oct;50(10):1207-1216. doi: 10.1111/imj.14704. Intern Med J. 2020. PMID: 31762133
-
Complications arising from cardiac implantable electrophysiological devices: review of epidemiology, pathogenesis and prevention for the clinician.Postgrad Med. 2016;128(2):223-30. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2016.1151327. Epub 2016 Feb 22. Postgrad Med. 2016. PMID: 26849147 Review.
-
Management of bacteremia in patients living with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices.Heart Rhythm. 2016 Nov;13(11):2247-2252. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.08.029. Epub 2016 Aug 19. Heart Rhythm. 2016. PMID: 27546815 Review.
Cited by
-
Congenital Complete Heart Block-To Stimulate (When?) or Not to Stimulate?Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jun 7;12(12):1158. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12121158. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38921273 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Information Needs and Decision-Making Before a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device: A Qualitative Study Utilizing Social Media Data.J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2024 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s10880-024-10024-6. Online ahead of print. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2024. PMID: 38773048
-
Trends in the 30-year span of noninfectious cardiovascular implantable electronic device complications in Olmsted County.Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Feb 14;5(3):158-167. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.02.001. eCollection 2024 Mar. Heart Rhythm O2. 2024. PMID: 38560372 Free PMC article.
-
Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and allergy.J Arrhythm. 2023 Apr 18;39(3):310-314. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12852. eCollection 2023 Jun. J Arrhythm. 2023. PMID: 37324770 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Institutional Variation in 30-Day Complications Following Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Feb 15;11(4):e022009. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022009. Epub 2022 Feb 12. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022. PMID: 35156395 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical