Background and aim: Standardizing evaluative outcomes and their assessment facilitates comparisons between clinical studies and provides a basis for comparing direct effects of different treatment options. The aim of this study was to systematically review types of outcomes and measurement instruments used in studies regarding treatment options for slow-transit constipation (STC) in adults.
Methods: In this systematic review of the literature, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO from inception through February 2018, for papers assessing any STC treatment in adult patients. Outcomes were systematically extracted and categorized in domains using the conceptual framework of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology filter 2.0. Outcome reporting was stratified by decade of publication, intervention, and study type.
Results: Forty-seven studies were included in this systematic review. Fifty-nine different types of outcomes were identified. The outcomes were structured in three core areas and 18 domains. The most commonly reported domains were defecation functions (94%), gastrointestinal transit (53%), and health-care service use (51%). The most frequently reported outcomes were defecation frequency (83%), health-related quality of life (43%), and adverse events and complications (43%). In 62% of the studies, no primary outcome was defined, whereas in two studies, more than one primary outcomes were selected. A wide diversity of measurement instruments was used to assess the reported outcomes.
Conclusion: Outcomes reported in studies on STC in adults are heterogeneous. A lack of standardization complicates comparisons between studies. Developing a core outcome set for STC in adults could contribute to standardization of outcome reporting in (future) studies.
Keywords: Core outcome set; OMERACT; Outcomes; Slow-transit constipation.
© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Colectomy for slow transit constipation: effective for patients with coexistent obstructed defecation.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jun;28(6):841-7. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1498-3. Epub 2013 Mar 23. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013. PMID: 23525467
Outcomes and outcomes measurements used in intervention studies of pelvic girdle pain and lumbopelvic pain: a systematic review.Chiropr Man Therap. 2019 Nov 5;27:62. doi: 10.1186/s12998-019-0279-2. eCollection 2019. Chiropr Man Therap. 2019. PMID: 31700607 Free PMC article.
Can we decide which outcomes should be measured in every clinical trial? A scoping review of the existing conceptual frameworks and processes to develop core outcome sets.J Rheumatol. 2014 May;41(5):986-93. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.131308. Epub 2014 Mar 1. J Rheumatol. 2014. PMID: 24584917 Review.
Nursing sensitive outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic literature review.Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Jan;77:115-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 12. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018. PMID: 29080437 Review.
Cochrane Review: Osmotic and stimulant laxatives for the management of childhood constipation (Review).Evid Based Child Health. 2013 Jan;8(1):57-109. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1893. Evid Based Child Health. 2013. PMID: 23878124 Review.
- Mugie SM, Benninga MA, Di Lorenzo C. Epidemiology of constipation in children and adults. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2011; 25: 3–18. - PubMed
- Suares NC, Ford AC. Prevalence of, and risk factors for, chronic idiopathic constipation in the community: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2011; 106: 1582–1591. - PubMed
- Basilisco G, Coletta M. Chronic constipation: a critical review. Dig. Liver Dis. 2013; 45: 886–893. - PubMed
- Lacy BE, Mearin F, Chang L et al Bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 2016; 150: 1393–1407.
- Cook IJ, Talley NJ, Benninga MA, Rao SS, Scott SM. Chronic constipation: overview and challenges. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2009; 21: 1–8. - PubMed