Clostridioides difficile on Ohio swine farms (2015): A comparison of swine and human environments and assessment of on-farm risk factors
- PMID: 31389666
- DOI: 10.1111/zph.12637
Clostridioides difficile on Ohio swine farms (2015): A comparison of swine and human environments and assessment of on-farm risk factors
Abstract
Swine are known reservoirs for Clostridioides difficile, formerly known as Clostridium difficile, and transmission from swine to human farm workers is strongly suggested by previous studies. This cross-sectional study evaluated the potential role of farm environmental surfaces, including those in worker breakrooms and swine housing areas, in the possible transmission of C. difficile from swine to farm workers. Environmental surfaces and piglet faeces at 13 Ohio swine farms were sampled in 2015. Typical culturing techniques were performed to isolate C. difficile from samples, and amplification of toxin genes (tcdA, tcdB and cdtB) and PCR-ribotyping were used to genetically characterize recovered isolates. In addition, sequencing of toxin regulatory gene, tcdC, was done to identify the length of identified deletions in some isolates. A survey collected farm-level management risk factor information. Clostridioides difficile was recovered from all farms, with 42% (188/445) of samples testing positive for C. difficile. Samples collected from all on-farm locations recovered C. difficile, including farrowing rooms (60%, 107/178), breakrooms (50%, 69/138) and nursery rooms (9%, 12/129). Three ribotypes recovered from both swine and human environments (078, 412 and 005) have been previously implicated in human disease. Samples taken from farrowing rooms and breakrooms were found to have greater odds of C. difficile recovery than those taken from nursery rooms (OR = 40.5, OR = 35.6, p < .001 respectively). Farms that weaned ≥23,500 pigs per year had lower odds of C. difficile recovery as compared to farms that weaned fewer pigs (OR = 0.4, p = .01) and weekly or more frequent cleaning of breakroom counters was associated with higher odds of C. difficile recovery (OR = 11.7, p < .001). This study provides important insights into the presence and characterization of C. difficile found in human environments on swine farms and highlights how these areas may be involved in transmission of C. difficile to swine farm workers and throughout the facility.
Keywords: Clostridioides difficile; biosecurity; breakroom; farm worker; swine; zoonotic transmission.
© 2019 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.
Similar articles
-
Quantification of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in feces of calves of different age and determination of predominant Clostridioides difficile ribotype 033 relatedness and transmission between family dairy farms using multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis.BMC Vet Res. 2018 Oct 1;14(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1616-8. BMC Vet Res. 2018. PMID: 30285751 Free PMC article.
-
PCR-ribotype distribution of Clostridium difficile in Irish pigs.Anaerobe. 2017 Dec;48:237-241. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 9. Anaerobe. 2017. PMID: 29024758
-
Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 046 is common among neonatal pigs and humans in Sweden.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Jan;20(1):O2-6. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12296. Epub 2013 Aug 8. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014. PMID: 23927574
-
Clostridium difficile infection in the community: a zoonotic disease?Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012 Jul;18(7):635-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03853.x. Epub 2012 Apr 27. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012. PMID: 22536816 Review.
-
One Health approach to Clostridioides difficile in Japan.J Infect Chemother. 2020 Jul;26(7):643-650. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2020.03.012. Epub 2020 Apr 23. J Infect Chemother. 2020. PMID: 32334949 Review.
Cited by
-
Clostridioides difficile in Pigs and Dairy Cattle in Northern Italy: Prevalence, Characterization and Comparison between Animal and Human Strains.Microorganisms. 2023 Jul 2;11(7):1738. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11071738. Microorganisms. 2023. PMID: 37512910 Free PMC article.
-
Make It Less difficile: Understanding Genetic Evolution and Global Spread of Clostridioides difficile.Genes (Basel). 2022 Nov 24;13(12):2200. doi: 10.3390/genes13122200. Genes (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36553467 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessment of the Transmission Dynamics of Clostridioides difficile in a Farm Environment Reveals the Presence of a New Toxigenic Strain Connected to Swine Production.Front Microbiol. 2022 Apr 14;13:858310. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.858310. eCollection 2022. Front Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 35495679 Free PMC article.
-
High contamination rates of shoes of veterinarians, veterinary support staff and veterinary students with Clostridioides difficile spores.Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022 Mar;69(2):685-693. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14034. Epub 2021 Feb 21. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022. PMID: 33559317 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Adesiyun, A., Webb, L., Musai, L., Louison, B., Joseph, G., Stewart-Johnson, A., … Rodrigo, S. (2014). Survey of Salmonella contamination in chicken layer farms in three Caribbean countries. Journal of Food Protection, 77(9), 1471-1480. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-021
-
- Arruda, P. H. E. (2014). Clostridium difficile infection in neonatal piglets: Pathogenesis, risk factors, and prevention. Iowa State University. Graduate Theses and Dissertations Digital Repository.
-
- Cheng, A. C., Collins, D. A., Elliott, B., Ferguson, J. K., Paterson, D. L., Thean, S., & Riley, T. V. (2016). Laboratory-based surveillance of Clostridium difficile circulating in Australia, September - November 2010. Pathology, 48(3), 257-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2016.02.005
-
- Curry, S. R., Marsh, J. W., Muto, C. A., O’Leary, M. M., Pasculle, A. W., & Harrison, L. H. (2007). tcdC genotypes associated with severe TcdC truncation in an epidemic clone and other strains of Clostridium difficile. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 45(1), 215-221. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01599-06
-
- Faires, M. C., Pearl, D. L., Berke, O., Reid-Smith, R. J., & Weese, J. S. (2013). The identification and epidemiology of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile in patient rooms and the ward environment. BMC Infectious Diseases, 13(1), https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-342
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
