Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 8;14(8):e0219296.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219296. eCollection 2019.

A Bayesian analysis of longitudinal farm surveys in Central Malawi reveals yield determinants and site-specific management strategies

Affiliations

A Bayesian analysis of longitudinal farm surveys in Central Malawi reveals yield determinants and site-specific management strategies

Han Wang et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Understanding the challenges to increasing maize productivity in sub-Saharan Africa, especially agronomic factors that reduce on-farm crop yield, has important implications for policies to reduce national and global food insecurity. Previous research on the maize yield gap has tended to emphasize the size of the gap (theoretical vs. achievable yields), rather than what determines maize yield in specific contexts. As a result, there is insufficient evidence on the key agronomic and environmental factors that influence maize yield in a smallholder farm environment. In this study, we implemented a Bayesian analysis with plot-level longitudinal household survey data covering 1,197 plots and 320 farms in Central Malawi. Households were interviewed and monitored three times per year, in 2015 and 2016, to document farmer management practices and seasonal rainfall, and direct measurements were taken of plant and soil characteristics to quantify impact on plot-level maize yield stability. The results revealed a high positive association between a leaf chlorophyll indicator and maize yield, with significance levels exceeding 95% Bayesian credibility at all sites and a regression coefficient posterior mean from 28% to 42% on a relative scale. A parasitic weed, Striga asiatica, was the variable most consistently negatively associated with maize yield, exceeding 95% credibility in most cases, of high intensity, with regression means ranging from 23% to 38% on a relative scale. The influence of rainfall, either directly or indirectly, varied by site and season. We conclude that the factors preventing Striga infestation and enhancing nitrogen fertility will lead to higher maize yield in Malawi. To improve plant nitrogen status, fertilizer was effective at higher productivity sites, whereas soil carbon and organic inputs were important at marginal sites. Uniquely, a Bayesian approach allowed differentiation of response by site for a relatively modest sample size study (given the complexity of farm environments and management practices). Considering the biophysical constraints, our findings highlight management strategies for crop yields, and point towards area-specific recommendations for nitrogen management and crop yield.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Bayesian regression model results for 95% credible intervals associated with drivers of maize yield for four EPA locations in Central Malawi.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Bayesian regression model results for 95% credible intervals associated with drivers of SPAD for four EPA locations in Central Malawi.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Logistic regression results for 95% credible intervals associated with drivers of striga prevention for four EPA locations in Central Malawi.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Bayesian regression model results for 95% credible intervals for the factors associated with striga control for four EPA locations in Central Malawi.

Similar articles

References

    1. Tittonell P, Giller KE. When yield gaps are poverty traps: The paradigm of ecological intensification in African smallholder agriculture. Field Crops Research. 2013;143:76–90.
    1. Lobell DB, Cassman KG, Field CB. Crop yield gaps: their importance, magnitudes, and causes. Annual review of environment and resources. 2009;34:179–204.
    1. Fermont AM, Van Asten PJ, Tittonell P, Van Wijk MT, Giller KE. Closing the cassava yield gap: an analysis from smallholder farms in East Africa. Field Crops Research. 2009;112(1):24–36.
    1. Lobell DB, Ortiz-Monasterio JI, Asner GP, Naylor RL, Falcon WP. Combining field surveys, remote sensing, and regression trees to understand yield variations in an irrigated wheat landscape. Agronomy Journal. 2005;97(1):241–9.
    1. van Vugt D, Franke A. Exploring the yield gap of orange-fleshed sweet potato varieties on smallholder farmers’ fields in Malawi. Field Crops Research. 2018;221:245–56.

Publication types

Grants and funding

This work originates from United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Grant AID-OAA-A-13-00006 entitled Africa RISING (Research In Sustainable Intensification for the Next Generation, https://africa-rising.net/category/partners/iita/), supported by the International Institute for Tropical Agriculture through a grant to SS, with support from Michigan State University. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, decision to publish or manuscript preparation.