Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 12;17(8):e3000384.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000384. eCollection 2019 Aug.

A Standardized Citation Metrics Author Database Annotated for Scientific Field

Affiliations
Free PMC article

A Standardized Citation Metrics Author Database Annotated for Scientific Field

John P A Ioannidis et al. PLoS Biol. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Citation metrics are widely used and misused. We have created a publicly available database of 100,000 top scientists that provides standardized information on citations, h-index, coauthorship-adjusted hm-index, citations to papers in different authorship positions, and a composite indicator. Separate data are shown for career-long and single-year impact. Metrics with and without self-citations and ratio of citations to citing papers are given. Scientists are classified into 22 scientific fields and 176 subfields. Field- and subfield-specific percentiles are also provided for all scientists who have published at least five papers. Career-long data are updated to end of 2017 and to end of 2018 for comparison.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. JPAI is a member of the editorial board of PLoS Biology. Jeroen Baas is an Elsevier employee. Elsevier runs Scopus, which is the source of this data, and also runs Mendeley Data where the database is now stored.

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 3 articles

References

    1. Hicks D, Wouters P, Waltman L, de Rijcke S, Rafols I. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature 2015;520:429–431. 10.1038/520429a - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ioannidis JP, Klavans R, Boyack KW. Multiple citation indicators and their composite across scientific disciplines. PLoS Biol. 2016;14(7):e1002501 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002501 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fowler JH, Aksnes DW. Does self-citation pay? Scientometrics 2007;72:427–437.
    1. Archambault, E., Caruso, J., & Beauchesne, O. (2011). Towards a multilingual, comprehensive and open scientific journal ontology. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, 66–77.
    1. Schotten M., el Aisati M., Meester W., Steiginga S., & Ross C. (2017). A Brief History of Scopus: The World’s Largest Abstract and Citation Database of Scientific Literature In Cantu-Ortiz F., Research Analytics. Boosting University Productivity and Competitiveness through Scientometrics.

Publication types

Grant support

The Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS) has been funded by the Laura and John Arnold Foundation (funding to JPAI). The work of JPAI is also funded by an unrestricted gift from Sue and Bob O’Donnell. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback