Background: Treatment of those at clinical high-risk (CHR) for developing psychosis may lead to preventive strategies. However, attrition in trials may hamper efforts to detect effective changes and lead to bias. Our objective was to synthesize the relative attrition rates in clinical trials conducted in CHR for psychosis samples.
Method: We searched the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and EBM with no restrictions. Inclusion criteria was any treatment-based randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted in CHR samples that reported attrition. Relative attrition rates were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis, stratified by time, and reported as odds ratios (ORs), proportions, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results: Twenty-one RCTs met our inclusion criteria, including a total of 2260 CHR participants. Attrition rates between all treatment types identified were not statistically different from control treatments at any time-point. When accessing overall trial attrition, the pooled attrition rate was 29.57% (95% CI = 23.84-35.63%) with statistically significant heterogeneity (I2 = 88.70%; P < .001). Furthermore, 11 trials had a subsequent follow-up after the intervention was conducted and the pooled attrition was 33.96% (95% CI = 24.94-43.59%). When examining predictors of attrition, no statistically significant subgroup differences were observed in attrition rates.
Conclusions: Almost one third of CHR participants will not complete participation in an RCT, however no predictors were found to be statistically significantly related to attrition. Methods to account for missing data and attrition are warranted in CHR trials to account for potential biases associated with high attrition rates.
Keywords: attrition; clinical high-risk; meta-analysis; systematic review; treatment.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Behavioral and Pharmacotherapy Weight Loss Interventions to Prevent Obesity-Related Morbidity and Mortality in Adults: An Updated Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet]EL LeBlanc et al. PMID 30354042. - ReviewWe found that behavior-based weight-loss interventions with or without weight loss medications resulted in more weight loss than usual care conditions. The degree of weig …
Tobacco Cessation Interventions for Young PeopleGM Grimshaw et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4), CD003289. PMID 17054164. - ReviewComplex approaches show promise, with some persistence of abstinence (30 days point prevalence abstinence at six months), especially those incorporating elements sensitiv …
Pharmacological Interventions for the Treatment of Depression in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseJ Pollok et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12 (12), CD012346. PMID 30566235. - Meta-AnalysisThere is insufficient evidence to make definitive statements about the efficacy or safety of antidepressants for treating COPD-related depression. New RCTs are needed; wi …
Atypical Antipsychotics for Psychosis in AdolescentsA Kumar et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (10), CD009582. PMID 24129841. - ReviewNo convincing evidence suggests that atypical antipsychotic medications are superior to typical medications for the treatment of adolescents with psychosis. However, atyp …
Benzodiazepines for SchizophreniaM Dold et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11, CD006391. PMID 23152236. - ReviewThere is currently no convincing evidence to confirm or refute the practise of administering benzodiazepines as monotherapy or in combination with antipsychotics for the …