Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2020 Jun;66(6):e82-e86.
doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001053.

Management of Aortic Insufficiency Using Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Device Support

Affiliations
Case Reports

Management of Aortic Insufficiency Using Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Device Support

Biswajit Kar et al. ASAIO J. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) increase survival of patients with heart failure. However, long-term LVAD usage can result in aortic insufficiency (AI), thereby compromising LVAD efficiency. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an alternative for patients with high risk for surgical valve replacement. We present three cases that developed moderate to severe AI while on HeartMate II (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL) LVAD support; hence, TAVR procedure was performed. Patients A and B (74 year old and 38 year old) developed severe AI and patient C (67 year old) developed moderate AI with cardiogenic shock, after 368, 1,288, and 342 days on LVAD support, respectively. Their aortic valve annulus sizes were 24.2, 24.6, and 23.3 mm, respectively. Oversized Edwards SAPIEN 3 valves (Edwards, Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) were implanted via a transfemoral approach. The patients were hemodynamically stable after the procedure with mild AI in patient A and no AI in patients B and C. Patients were all discharged to home. Follow-up in patients A and C have resulted in long-term (> 2 years) survival and patient B died 616 days after the procedure due to unrelated complications. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement may be an alternative way to manage AI in LVAD patients. Larger studies are needed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of this approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jorde UP, Uriel N, Nahumi N, et al. Prevalence, significance, and management of aortic insufficiency in continuous flow left ventricular assist device recipients. Circ Heart Fail 2014.7: 310–319.
    1. Sayer G, Sarswat N, Kim GH, et al. The hemodynamic effects of aortic insufficiency in patients supported with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. J Card Fail 2017.23: 545–551.
    1. Cowger J, Rao V, Massey T, et al. Comprehensive review and suggested strategies for the detection and management of aortic insufficiency in patients with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant 2015.34: 149–157.
    1. Mudd JO, Cuda JD, Halushka M, Soderlund KA, Conte JV, Russell SD. Fusion of aortic valve commissures in patients supported by a continuous axial flow left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant 2008.27: 1269–1274.
    1. John R, Mantz K, Eckman P, Rose A, May-Newman K. Aortic valve pathophysiology during left ventricular assist device support. J Heart Lung Transplant 2010.29: 1321–1329.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources