Diagrams and alien ways of thinking

Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2019 Jun:75:12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.09.010. Epub 2018 Nov 9.

Abstract

The recent wave of data on exoplanets lends support to METI ventures (Messaging to Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence), insofar as the more exoplanets we find, the more likely it is that "exominds" await our messages. Yet, despite these astronomical advances, there are presently no well-confirmed tests against which to check the design of interstellar messages. In the meantime, the best we can do is distance ourselves from terracentric assumptions. There is no reason, for example, to assume that all inferential abilities are language-like. With that in mind, I argue that logical reasoning does not have to be couched in symbolic notation. In diagrammatic reasoning, inferences are underwritten, not by rules, but by transformations of self-same qualitative signs. I use the Existential Graphs of C. S. Peirce to show this. Since diagrams are less dependent on convention and might even be generalized to cover non-visual senses, I argue that METI researchers should add some form of diagrammatic representations to their repertoire. Doing so can shed light, not just on alien minds, but on the deepest structures of reasoning itself.

Keywords: Astrobiology; C. S. Peirce; Diagrammatic reasoning; Diagrams; Inference; Messaging.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't