Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 23;18(1):286.
doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-2917-5.

Using sibship reconstructions to understand the relationship between larval habitat productivity and oviposition behaviour in Kenyan Anopheles arabiensis

Affiliations

Using sibship reconstructions to understand the relationship between larval habitat productivity and oviposition behaviour in Kenyan Anopheles arabiensis

Joel O Odero et al. Malar J. .

Abstract

Background: Strategies for combatting residual malaria by targeting vectors outdoors are gaining importance as the limitations of primary indoor interventions are reached. Strategies to target ovipositing females or her offspring are broadly applicable because all mosquitoes require aquatic habitats for immature development irrespective of their biting or resting preferences. Oviposition site selection by gravid females is frequently studied by counting early instar larvae in habitats; an approach which is valid only if the number of larvae correlates with the number of females laying eggs. This hypothesis was tested against the alternative, that a higher abundance of larvae results from improved survival of a similar or fewer number of families.

Methods: In a controlled experiment, 20 outdoor artificial ponds were left uncovered for 4 days to allow oviposition by wild mosquitoes, then covered with netting and first and second instar larvae sampled daily. Natural Anopheles habitats of two different types were also identified, and all visible larvae sampled. All larvae were identified to species, and most samples of the predominant species, Anopheles arabiensis, were genotyped using microsatellites for sibling group reconstructions using two contrasting softwares, BAPS and COLONY.

Results: In the ponds, the number of families reconstructed by each software significantly predicted larval abundance (BAPS R2 = 0.318, p = 0.01; COLONY R2 = 0.476, p = 0.001), and suggested that around 50% of females spread larvae across multiple ponds (skip oviposition). From natural habitats, the mean family size again predicted larval abundance using BAPS (R2 = 0.829, p = 0.017) though not using COLONY (R2 = 0.218, p = 0.68), but both softwares once more suggested high rates of skip oviposition (in excess of 50%).

Conclusion: This study shows that, whether in closely-located artificial habitats or natural breeding sites, higher early instar larval densities result from more females laying eggs in these sites. These results provide empirical support for use of early instar larval abundance as an index for oviposition site preference. Furthermore, the sharing of habitats by multiple females and the high skip-oviposition rate in An. arabiensis suggest that larviciding by auto-dissemination of insecticide may be successful.

Keywords: Anopheles arabiensis; Auto-dissemination; Larval control; Microsatellites; Sibship-reconstruction; Skip-oviposition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the experimental design and analysis methods used in the study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relationship between mosquito family clusters inferred using COLONY and BAPS with the total number of larvae from each artificial pond habitat
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Pond setup and mosquito family distribution across the 18 ponds as inferred using BAPS. The colours represent families from a single mother
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Pond setup and mosquito family distribution across the 18 ponds as inferred using COLONY. The colours represent families from a single mother with only families with two or more offspring visualized (n = 60)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
A regression curve comparing relationship between mosquito families inferred using COLONY and BAPS with the total number of larvae from natural habitats

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bhatt S, Weiss DJ, Cameron E, Bisanzio D, Mappin B, Dalrymple U, et al. The effect of malaria control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015. Nature. 2015;526:207–211. doi: 10.1038/nature15535. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO. World Malaria Report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. https://www.who.int/malaria/publications/world-malaria-report-2018/repor.... Accessed 5 Dec 2018.
    1. Govella NJ, Ferguson H. Why use of interventions targeting outdoor biting mosquitoes will be necessary to achieve malaria elimination. Front Physiol. 2012;3:199. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00199. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Killeen GF. Characterizing, controlling and eliminating residual malaria transmission. Malar J. 2014;13:330. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-330. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ranson H, Edi CVA, Koudou BG, Jones CM, Weetman D. Multiple-insecticide resistance in Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes, southern Côte d’Ivoire. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:1508–1511. doi: 10.3201/eid1809.120262. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources