Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov;23(11):7873-7878.
doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14614. Epub 2019 Aug 27.

Evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing to detect chromosomal aberrations in a Chinese cohort

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing to detect chromosomal aberrations in a Chinese cohort

Wanting Cui et al. J Cell Mol Med. 2019 Nov.
Free PMC article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical feasibility of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) to detect foetal copy number variations (CNVs). Next-generation sequencing for detecting foetal copy number variations (CNVs) was performed on the collected samples from 161 pregnancies with ultrasound anomalies and negative NIPT results for aneuploidy. The performance of NIPT for detecting chromosome aberrations was calculated. The sensitivity and specificity of NIPT for detecting CNVs > 1 Mb were 83.33% and 99.34%; the PPV and negative predictive rate (NPV) were 90.91% and 98.68%. Non-invasive prenatal testing can be performed to detect chromosomal aberrations in first trimester with high performance for CNVs, and occasional discordant cases are unavoidable.

Keywords: copy number variations; genetic counselling; non-invasive prenatal testing; prenatal diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The comparative chromosome plots from NIPT (left) and CNV‐seq (right). A, In false positive case SJ023, NIPT detected a 32.5 Mb duplication at chr13 q12.11‐q14.3, which was not confirmed by CNV‐seq. B, In false negative case SJ015, CNV‐seq detected a 27.66 Mb duplication at chr4 q26‐q31.21, which was missed by NIPT. C, In false negative case SJ028, CNV‐seq detected a 12.29 Mb deletion at chr10 p15.3‐p13, which was missed by NIPT

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Odibo AO, Gray DL, Dicke JM, Stamilio DM, Macones GA, Crane JP. Revisiting the fetal loss rate after second‐trimester genetic amniocentesis: a single center's 16‐year experience. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:589‐595. - PubMed
    1. Zhang H, Gao Y, Jiang F, et al. Non‐invasive prenatal testing for trisomies 21, 18 and 13: clinical experience from 146 958 pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45:530‐538. - PubMed
    1. Liang D, Lv W, Wang H, et al. Non‐invasive prenatal testing of fetal whole chromosome aneuploidy by massively parallel sequencing. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33:409‐415. - PubMed
    1. Song Y, Liu C, Qi H, Zhang Y, Bian X, Liu J. Noninvasive prenatal testing of fetal aneuploidies by massively parallel sequencing in a prospective Chinese population. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33:700‐706. - PubMed
    1. Cohen K, Tzika A, Wood H, et al. Diagnosis of fetal submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities in failed array CGH samples: copy number by sequencing as an alternative to microarrays for invasive fetal testing. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45:394‐401. - PubMed

Publication types