Isolating Proactive Slowing from Reactive Inhibitory Control in Heavy Drinkers

Subst Use Misuse. 2020;55(1):167-173. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2019.1658783. Epub 2019 Aug 27.

Abstract

Background: Impaired inhibitory control is thought to contribute to alcohol (mis)use. However, current definitions of inhibitory control are over-simplified by a failure to distinguish reactive inhibitory control from proactive slowing. Objectives: To distinguish "reactive" inhibitory control and proactive slowing in heavy drinkers, and characterize associations between both constructs and individual differences in alcohol consumption. Methods: Sixty heavy drinkers completed self-reported measures of alcohol consumption, followed by two modified Stop-Signal tasks and an AX-continuous performance task in a laboratory setting. Results: Heavy drinkers demonstrated proactive slowing when inhibition was more likely but individual differences in proactive slowing and reactive stopping were unrelated to individual differences in alcohol consumption. Conclusions/Importance: Within a sample of heavy drinkers, individual differences in reactive inhibitory control and proactive slowing are unrelated to individual differences in alcohol consumption.

Keywords: Alcohol; inhibitory control; proactive slowing; stop-signal task.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Alcohol Drinking / psychology*
  • Executive Function / physiology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Individuality
  • Inhibition, Psychological*
  • Male
  • Neuropsychological Tests
  • Young Adult