Key Genetic Parameters for Population Management
- PMID: 31475027
- PMCID: PMC6707806
- DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00667
Key Genetic Parameters for Population Management
Abstract
Population management has the primary task of maximizing the long-term competitiveness of a breed. Breeds compete with each other for being able to supply consumer demands at low costs and also for funds from conservation programs. The competition for consumer preference is won by breeds with high genetic gain for total merit who maintained a sufficiently high genetic diversity, whereas the competition for funds is won by breeds with high conservation value. The conservation value of a breed could be improved by increasing its contribution to the gene pool of the species. This may include the recovery of its original genetic background and the maintenance of a high genetic diversity at native haplotype segments. The primary objective of a breeding program depends on the genetic state of the population and its intended usage. In this paper, we review the key genetic parameters that are relevant for population management, compare the methods for estimating them, derive the formulas for predicting their value at a future time, and clarify their usage in various types of breeding programs that differ in their main objectives. These key parameters are kinships, native kinships, breeding values, Mendelian sampling variances, native contributions, and mutational effects. Population management currently experiences a transition from using pedigree-based estimates to marker-based estimates, which improves the accuracies of these estimates and thereby increases response to selection. In addition, improved measures of the factors that determine the competitiveness of a breed and utilize auxiliary parameters, such as Mendelian sampling variances, mutational effects, and native kinships, enable to improve further upon historic recommendations for genetic population management.
Keywords: Mendelian sampling variance; breeding values; native contribution; native founder genome equivalent; native kinship; optimum contribution selection; runs of homozygosity; segment-based kinship.
Similar articles
-
Novel optimum contribution selection methods accounting for conflicting objectives in breeding programs for livestock breeds with historical migration.Genet Sel Evol. 2017 May 12;49(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12711-017-0320-7. Genet Sel Evol. 2017. PMID: 28499352 Free PMC article.
-
Optimum contribution selection for animal breeding and conservation: the R package optiSel.BMC Bioinformatics. 2019 Jan 14;20(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2450-5. BMC Bioinformatics. 2019. PMID: 30642239 Free PMC article.
-
Long-Term Impact of Optimum Contribution Selection Strategies on Local Livestock Breeds with Historical Introgression Using the Example of German Angler Cattle.G3 (Bethesda). 2017 Dec 4;7(12):4009-4018. doi: 10.1534/g3.117.300272. G3 (Bethesda). 2017. PMID: 29089375 Free PMC article.
-
Managing genomes of conserved livestock breeds with historical introgression to decrease genetic overlap with other breeds.J Anim Breed Genet. 2019 Nov;136(6):505-517. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12405. Epub 2019 May 22. J Anim Breed Genet. 2019. PMID: 31115935
-
Advanced optimum contribution selection as a tool to improve regional cattle breeds: a feasibility study for Vorderwald cattle.Animal. 2020 Jan;14(1):1-12. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119001484. Epub 2019 Jul 12. Animal. 2020. PMID: 31296274
Cited by
-
Population genomics of American mink using genotype data.Front Genet. 2023 May 9;14:1175408. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1175408. eCollection 2023. Front Genet. 2023. PMID: 37274788 Free PMC article.
-
Variation in the proportion of the segregating genome shared between full-sibling cattle and sheep.Genet Sel Evol. 2023 Apr 18;55(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12711-023-00802-5. Genet Sel Evol. 2023. PMID: 37072693 Free PMC article.
-
Pedigree and genome-based patterns of homozygosity in the South African Ayrshire, Holstein, and Jersey breeds.Front Genet. 2023 Mar 17;14:1136078. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1136078. eCollection 2023. Front Genet. 2023. PMID: 37007942 Free PMC article.
-
Performance evaluation and genetic parameters estimation of multi-companies maize hybrids in Lamahi Dang, Nepal.Heliyon. 2023 Mar 15;9(3):e14552. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14552. eCollection 2023 Mar. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 36967871 Free PMC article.
-
Genetic Parameters of Growth Traits and Quantitative Genetic Metrics for Selection and Conservation of Mecheri Sheep of Tamil Nadu.Animals (Basel). 2023 Jan 28;13(3):454. doi: 10.3390/ani13030454. Animals (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36766344 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Amador C., Toro M. A., Fernández J. (2011). Removing exogeneous information using pedigree data. Conserv. Gent. 12, 1565–1573. 10.1007/s10592-011-0255-4 - DOI
-
- Bijma P., Wientjes Y. C. J., Calus M. P. L. (2018). Increasing genetic gain by selecting for higher Mendelian sampling variance. Proc. World Congr. Genetics Appl. Livest. Prod. 11, 47.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
