Robot-assisted sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-y gastric bypass: results from the metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program data registry

Abstract

Background: A stronger evidence base is needed to more fully understand the precise role that robot-assisted (RA) approaches may play in bariatrics.

Objective: To investigate the utilization and safety of RA-sleeve gastrectomy (RA-SG) and RA-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RA-RYGB) using data from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) registry.

Setting: National Database.

Methods: We queried the MBSAQIP 2015 through 2016 registry for patients who underwent primary conventional laparoscopic or RA-SG and RA-RYGB. We compared pre- and perioperative characteristics and 30-day outcomes using logistic regression where number of events met statistical guidelines.

Results: We included 126,987 cases: conventional laparoscopic SG (n = 83,940), RA-SG (n = 6,780), conventional laparoscopic RYGB (n = 33,525), and RA-RYGB (n = 2,742). The RA significantly lengthened operation time by 24 and 23 minutes for SG and RYGB, respectively. Mortality and serious adverse events were similar for the 2 techniques. RA-SG was associated with higher rates of 30-day intervention (1.3% versus .8%, OR: 1.38, P < .05) and hospital stay >2 days (12.1% versus 9.3%, OR: 1.30, P < .001). RA-RYGB was associated with higher 30-day rates of reoperation (2.6% versus 2.0%, OR: 1.37, P < .05) and readmission (7.0% versus 5.8%, OR:1.21, P < .05) and lower rates of transfusion (0.62% versus 1.12%, OR: .54, P < .05) and hospital stay >2 days (15.7% versus 17%, OR: .89, P < .05).

Conclusion: RA is as safe as the conventional laparoscopic approach in terms of mortality and serious adverse events.

Keywords: Roux-en Y gastric bypass; bariatric surgery; robot-assist; robotic; sleeve gastrectomy.