Prediction and Consequences of Cofragmentation in Metaproteomics

J Proteome Res. 2019 Oct 4;18(10):3555-3566. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00144. Epub 2019 Sep 19.

Abstract

Metaproteomics can provide critical information about biological systems, but peptides are found within a complex background of other peptides. This complex background can change across samples, in some cases drastically. Cofragmentation, the coelution of peptides with similar mass to charge ratios, is one factor that influences which peptides are identified in an LC-MS/MS experiment: it is dependent on the nature and complexity of this dynamic background. Metaproteomics applications are particularly susceptible to cofragmentation-induced bias; they have vast protein sequence diversity and the abundance of those proteins can span many orders of magnitude. We have developed a mechanistic model that determines the number of potentially cofragmenting peptides in a given sample (called cobia, https://github.com/bertrand-lab/cobia ). We then used previously published data sets to validate our model, showing that the resulting peptide-specific score reflects the cofragmentation "risk" of peptides. Using an Antarctic sea ice edge metatranscriptome case study, we found that more rare taxonomic and functional groups are associated with higher cofragmentation bias. We also demonstrate how cofragmentation scores can be used to guide the selection of protein- or peptide-based biomarkers. We illustrate potential consequences of cofragmentation for multiple metaproteomic approaches, and suggest practical paths forward to cope with cofragmentation-induced bias.

Keywords: chimeric spectra; cofragmentation; metaproteomics; mixture spectra.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Bias
  • Chromatography, Liquid
  • Peptide Fragments / analysis*
  • Proteomics / methods*
  • Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Substances

  • Peptide Fragments