Wrist band photoplethysmography in detection of individual pulses in atrial fibrillation and algorithm-based detection of atrial fibrillation

Abstract

Aims: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common tachyarrhythmia and a significant cause of cardioembolic strokes. Atrial fibrillation is often intermittent and asymptomatic making detection a major clinical challenge. We evaluated a photoplethysmography (PPG) wrist band in individual pulse detection in patients with AF and tested the reliability of two commonly used algorithms for AF detection.

Methods and results: A 5-min PPG was recorded from patients with AF or sinus rhythm (SR) with a wrist band and analysed with two AF detection algorithms; AFEvidence and COSEn. Simultaneously registered electrocardiogram served as the golden standard for rhythm analysis and was interpreted by two cardiologists. The study population consisted of 213 (106 AF, 107 SR) patients. The wrist band PPG achieved individual pulse detection with a sensitivity of 91.7 ± 11.2% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 97.5 ± 4.6% for AF, with a sensitivity of 99.4 ± 1.5% [7.7% (95% confidence interval, 95% CI 5.5% to 9.9%); P < 0.001] and PPV of 98.1 ± 4.1% [0.6% (95% CI -0.6% to 1.7%); P = 0.350] for SR. The pulse detection sensitivity was lower 86.7 ± 13.9% with recent-onset AF (AF duration <48 h, n = 43, 40.6%) as compared to late AF (≥48 h, n = 63, 59.4%) with 95.1 ± 7.2% [-8.3% (95% CI -12.9% to -3.7%); P = 0.001]. For the detection of AF from the wrist band PPG, the sensitivities were 96.2%/95.3% and specificity 98.1% with two algorithms.

Conclusion: The wrist band PPG enabled accurate algorithm-based detection of AF with two AF detection algorithms and high individual pulse detection. Algorithms allowed accurate detection of AF from the PPG. A PPG wrist band provides an easy solution for AF screening.

Keywords: Algorithms; Atrial fibrillation; Heart rate; Photoplethysmography; Pulse; Screening; Stroke.