Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 9;2(1):e11561.
doi: 10.2196/11561.

Advancing Optimal Development in Children: Examining the Construct Validity of a Parent Reflective Functioning Questionnaire

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Advancing Optimal Development in Children: Examining the Construct Validity of a Parent Reflective Functioning Questionnaire

Monica De Roo et al. JMIR Pediatr Parent. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Parental reflective functioning (PRF) is the capacity parents have to understand their own mental states and those of their children, as well as the influence of those mental states on behavior. Parents with greater capacity for PRF are more likely to foster secure attachment with their children. The Parental Development Interview is a gold standard measure of PRF but is hampered by cost, training, and length of administration. The 18-item Parent Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (PRFQ-18) is a simpler option developed to capture 3 types of PRF: (1) prementalizing, (2) parent's certainty, and (3) interest and curiosity surrounding a child's mental state.

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the factor structure and select psychometric properties of the PRFQ in a sample of Canadian parents.

Methods: We examined the factor structure and discriminant and construct validity of the PRFQ-18 among 306 parents (males=120 and females=186) across Canada; the age range of children was 0 to 12 years. Parents also completed Web-based measures of perceived stress, parental coping, parenting competence, and social support.

Results: A confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the hypothesized 3-factor structure of the PRFQ-18 providing evidence that the PRFQ-18 may be a useful and practical measure of PRF in Canadian adults and showed minor revisions may improve the suitability of the PRFQ-18 for assessing PRF.

Conclusions: These results add support for the construct validity of the PRFQ-18.

Keywords: mentalization; parent reflective functioning; parenting; questionnaire design.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Parent Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (PRFQ) model without items 11 and 18.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Slade A. Parental reflective functioning: an introduction. Attach Hum Dev. 2005 Sep;7(3):269–81. doi: 10.1080/14616730500245906. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fonagy P, Steele M, Steele H, Moran G, Higgitt A. The capacity for understanding mental states: the reflective self in parent and child and its significance for security of attachment. Infant Ment Health J. 1991 Sep 12;12(3):201–18. doi: 10.1002/1097-0355(199123)1. - DOI
    1. Koren-Karie N, Oppenheim D, Dolev S, Sher E, Etzion-Carasso A. Mothers' insightfulness regarding their infants' internal experience: relations with maternal sensitivity and infant attachment. Dev Psychol. 2002 Jul;38(4):534–42. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.38.4.534. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grienenberger JF, Kelly K, Slade A. Maternal reflective functioning, mother-infant affective communication, and infant attachment: exploring the link between mental states and observed caregiving behavior in the intergenerational transmission of attachment. Attach Hum Dev. 2005 Sep;7(3):299–311. doi: 10.1080/14616730500245963. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sadler LS, Slade A, Close N, Webb DL, Simpson T, Fennie K, Mayes LC. Minding the baby: enhancing reflectiveness to improve early health and relationship outcomes in an interdisciplinary home visiting program. Infant Ment Health J. 2013 Sep 1;34(5):391–405. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21406. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback