Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec;34(12):2557-2562.
doi: 10.1007/s00467-019-04346-z. Epub 2019 Sep 13.

Defining a threshold for tacrolimus intra-patient variability associated with late acute cellular rejection in paediatric kidney transplant recipients

Affiliations

Defining a threshold for tacrolimus intra-patient variability associated with late acute cellular rejection in paediatric kidney transplant recipients

Karmila Abu Bakar et al. Pediatr Nephrol. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Late acute cellular rejection (LACR) is associated with poorer graft outcomes and non-adherence. Non-adherence to tacrolimus can be indirectly assessed by the intra-patient variability (IPV) of tacrolimus trough levels. The threshold of IPV associated with rejection is not known.

Methods: We conducted a case-control study comparing 25 patients with biopsy-proven LACR against 25 stable controls matched for age group, primary diagnosis and time post-transplant. IPV was calculated using coefficient of variance (CV) and mean absolute deviation (MAD) using tacrolimus levels in the preceding 12 months. We also assessed the percentage time for tacrolimus levels < 4 μg/L (Tac < 4) and the concentration/weight-adjusted dose (C/D) ratio as a proxy marker of tacrolimus metaboliser status.

Results: LACR patients had higher CV (median, IQR 44%, 36-61% v. 24%, 19-35%, p < 0.0001) and higher MAD (33%, 25-48% v. 19%, 15-26%, p < 0.0001). The MAD was less affected by outlying tacrolimus results. Receiver operating curve analysis of the MAD resulted in a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 76% at a threshold of 26% (AUC 0.85, p < 0.05). LACR patients had more Tac < 4 (50% v. 26%, p < 0.05). There was no difference in C/D suggesting that good IPV can be maintained in fast metabolisers. Patients with LACR had significantly increased creatinine at 12-month follow-up despite treatment (108 v. 5 umol/L increase from baseline) and four patients lost their allograft.

Conclusions: Monitoring of tacrolimus IPV using the MAD may be a clinical marker for LACR. A threshold IPV of 26% can potentially be used as a therapeutic target pending further validation studies.

Keywords: Graft survival; Intra-patient variability; Non-adherence; Rejection; Tacrolimus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. N Engl J Med. 2007 Dec 20;357(25):2562-75 - PubMed
    1. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2015 Apr;29(2):78-84 - PubMed
    1. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Dec;26(12):3114-22 - PubMed
    1. Am J Transplant. 2012 May;12(5):1157-67 - PubMed
    1. Pediatr Nephrol. 2019 Jan;34(1):31-43 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources