Importance: Courtesy authorship is defined as including an individual who has not met authorship criteria as an author. Although most journals follow strict authorship criteria, the current incidence of courtesy authorship is unknown.
Objective: To assess the practices related to courtesy authorship in surgical journals and academia.
Design, setting, and participants: A survey was conducted from July 15 to October 27, 2017, of the first authors and senior authors of original articles, reviews, and clinical trials published between 2014 and 2015 in 8 surgical journals categorized as having a high or low impact factor.
Main outcomes and measures: The prevalence of courtesy authorship overall and among subgroups of authors in high impact factor journals and low impact factor journals and among first authors and senior authors, as well as author opinions regarding courtesy authorship.
Results: A total of 203 first authors and 254 senior authors responded (of 369 respondents who provided data on sex, 271 were men and 98 were women), with most being in academic programs (first authors, 116 of 168 [69.0%]; senior authors, 173 of 202 [85.6%]). A total of 17.2% of respondents (42 of 244) reported adding courtesy authors for the surveyed publications: 20.4% by first authors (32 of 157) and 11.5% by senior authors (10 of 87), but 53.7% (131 of 244) reported adding courtesy authorship on prior publications and 33.2% (81 of 244) had been added as a courtesy author in the past. Although 45 of 85 senior authors (52.9%) thought that courtesy authorship has decreased, 93 of 144 first authors (64.6%) thought that courtesy authorship has not changed or had increased (P = .03). There was no difference in the incidence of courtesy authorship for low vs high impact factor journals. Both first authors (29 of 149 [19.5%]) and senior authors (19 of 85 [22.4%]) reported pressures to add courtesy authorship, but external pressure was greater for low impact factor journals than for high impact factor journals (77 of 166 [46.4%] vs 60 of 167 [35.9%]; P = .04). More authors in low impact factor journals than in high impact factor journals thought that courtesy authorship was less harmful to academia (55 of 114 [48.2%] vs 34 of 117 [29.1%]). Overall, senior authors reported more positive outcomes with courtesy authorship (eg, improved morale and avoided author conflicts) than did first authors.
Conclusions and relevance: Courtesy authorship use is common by both first and senior authors in low impact factor journals and high impact factor journals. There are different perceptions, practices, and pressures to include courtesy authorship for first and senior authors. Understanding these issues will lead to better education to eliminate this practice.
Conflict of interest statement
Despite Growing Number of Women Surgeons, Authorship Gender Disparity in Orthopaedic Literature Persists Over 30 YearsMA Brown et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. PMID 31283733.Women orthopaedic surgeons published a small proportion of academic orthopaedic research from 1987 to 2017, and women senior authors consistently published less than woul …
The Policy of Co-First Authorship and Co-Senior Authorship in Radiology JournalsP Khoshpouri et al. J Am Coll Radiol 16 (10), 1491-1498. PMID 31299249.Twenty-five of 29 journals responded to our survey (response rate: 86.2%). Of 25 journals, 20 (80%) allowed co-first authorship. Among these, 4 of 25 journals (16%) allow …
Gender Differences in Authorship of Critical Care LiteratureKC Vranas et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. PMID 31968182.Women comprise less than one-third of first authors and one-quarter of senior authors of critical care research, with minimal increase over the past decade. When the seni …
Collaboration Metrics Among Female and Male Researchers: A 5-Year Review of Publications in Major Radiology JournalsJC Campbell et al. Acad Radiol 25 (7), 951-954. PMID 29887278. - ReviewOriginal research articles published with a female first or last author were associated with more departments and institutions, but not with the total number of authors, …
Visibility and Representation of Women in Multiple Sclerosis ResearchA Thomson et al. Neurology 92 (15), 713-719. PMID 30894447. - ReviewThere is substantial female drop-off between junior and senior research level across multiple areas. Strategies to support gender balance are urgently required, including …
Cited by 2 PubMed Central articles
Unjustified Authorship Such as Gift Authorship for Your Kids: It Is a Crime, ProfessorSK Min. Vasc Specialist Int 35 (4), 181-183. PMID 31915660.
Unjustified Authorship Should Not Be ToleratedST Hong. J Korean Med Sci 34 (45), e310. PMID 31760715.