Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 29;10:233-241.
doi: 10.2147/PROM.S156291. eCollection 2019.

PROMs Data: Can It Be Used to Make Decisions for Individual Patients? A Narrative Review

Free PMC article

PROMs Data: Can It Be Used to Make Decisions for Individual Patients? A Narrative Review

Jonathan Field et al. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. .
Free PMC article


Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used in clinical practice providing health care professionals with patients' perceptions and views of their health. They have traditionally been utilized in health research and health service evaluation and are now starting to be used in routine clinical practice with individual patients. The repeated administration of PROMs over the course of care with individual patients has a role in patient assessment, assisting clinical decision-making, and tracking patient progress. This approach can influence the patient-clinician encounter impacting the therapeutic alliance and increasing patient engagement with care. It is also theorized to improve patient outcomes and satisfaction with care. Advances in technologies and innovations in methodology have led to the use of electronic systems to simplify the collection and reporting of PROMs. Challenges of using PROMs with individual patients include clinician knowledge and skills, and access to appropriate technology. This paper reviews the use of PROMs with individual patients, illustrating how they may affect the patient-clinician encounter impact satisfaction and health outcomes. The routine use of PROMs during a course of care rather than just at the start and end provides additional opportunity to inform clinician and patient with benefits to both. The adoption of PROMs in clinical practice can help health care professionals to make decisions for individual patients. Further work is needed to examine the implementation of PROMs and benefits of PROMs in different clinical contexts.

Keywords: PROMs; clinical decision-making; patient outcome assessment; patient-reported outcome measures.

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Jonathan Field has an interest in the Care Response ePROM system. This is a free to use product which does not have any financial benefit. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 2 articles


    1. Dawson J, Doll H, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C, Carr AJ. The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings. BMJ. 2010;340:c186. doi:10.1136/bmj.c293 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bausewein C, Daveson B, Benalia H, Simon ST, Higginson IJ. Outcome Measurement in Palliative Care the Essentials. UK: PRISMA; 2011.
    1. Greenfield S, Nelson EC. Recent developments and future issues in the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings. Med Care. 1992;30(5 Suppl):Ms23–Ms41. - PubMed
    1. Nelson EC, Berwick DM. The measurement of health status in clinical practice. Med Care. 1989;27(3 Suppl.):S77–S90. - PubMed
    1. Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life: a conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA. 1995;273(1):59–65. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources