Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Sep;36(3):202-222.
doi: 10.1111/hir.12276.

Meeting the Review Family: Exploring Review Types and Associated Information Retrieval Requirements

Affiliations
Review

Meeting the Review Family: Exploring Review Types and Associated Information Retrieval Requirements

Anthea Sutton et al. Health Info Libr J. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: The last decade has witnessed increased recognition of the value of literature reviews for advancing understanding and decision making. This has been accompanied by an expansion in the range of methodological approaches and types of review. However, there remains uncertainty over definitions and search requirements beyond those for the 'traditional' systematic review. This study aims to characterise health related reviews by type and to provide recommendations on appropriate methods of information retrieval based on the available guidance.

Methods: A list of review types was generated from published typologies and categorised into 'families' based on their common features. Guidance on information retrieval for each review type was identified by searching pubmed, medline and Google Scholar, supplemented by scrutinising websites of review producing organisations.

Results: Forty-eight review types were identified and categorised into seven families. Published guidance reveals increasing specification of methods for information retrieval; however, much of it remains generic with many review types lacking explicit requirements for the identification of evidence.

Conclusions: Defining review types and utilising appropriate search methods remain challenging. By familiarising themselves with a range of review methodologies and associated search methods, information specialists will be better equipped to select suitable approaches for future projects.

Keywords: information retrieval; information science; literature searching; overview; search strategies.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 1 article

References

    1. Arnold, R., & Fletcher, D. (2012). A research synthesis and taxonomic classification of the organizational stressors encountered by sport performers. Journal of Sport Exercise Psychology, 34, 397-429. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.34.3.397
    1. Aveyard, H., & Bradbury-Jones, C. (2019). An analysis of current practices in undertaking literature reviews in nursing: Findings from a focused mapping review and synthesis. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19, 105. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0751-7
    1. Barnett-Page, E., & Thomas, J. (2009). Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: A critical review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9, 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-59
    1. Barroso, J., Gollop, C. J., Sandelowski, M., Meynell, J., Pearce, P. F., & Collins, L. J. (2003). The challenges of searching for and retrieving qualitative studies. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25, 153-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945902250034
    1. Barr-Walker, J. (2017). Evidence-based information needs of public health workers: A systematized review. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105, 69-79. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.109

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback